Oncogene, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41388-026-03763-3

Trisomy 8 alters chromatin conformations and activates Y chromosome genes in stem cells to drive a pre-leukemic state

Oncogene, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41388-026-03747-3

Pre-operative circulating tumor cells predict worse treatment outcome in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Oncogene, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41388-026-03766-0

S100A6 promotes liver metastasis by activating FGFR3 signaling in BAP1-deficient uveal melanoma

Oncogene, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41388-026-03742-8

Deciphering functional intra-tumoral heterogeneity in BRAF^V600E-driven mouse thyroid cancer reveals EMT trajectory and metabolic remodeling

Oncogene, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41388-026-03764-2

Spliceosomal component SNRPE drives cell proliferation by regulating CTP synthase 1 mRNA splicing in ovarian cancer

npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02586-6

Comparison of AI-generated radiology impressions: a multi-stakeholder evaluation

npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02596-4

Decipher-MR: a vision-language foundation model for 3D MRI representations

npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02594-6

A neural-symbolic AI agent system for biomedical concept mapping

npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02573-x

HoloTrauma 3X Triadic AI Co reasoning for robot assisted emergency maxillofacial reconstruction

npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02571-z

Developing psychosocial phenotypes to understand engagement with digital health technologies for heart failure

npj Digital Medicine, Published online: 04 April 2026; doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02584-8

We re-evaluated GPT-5 using our published pipelines: 500 emergency vignettes across 32 sociodemographic labels for bias, and adversarial prompts with fabricated details. GPT-5 showed no measurable improvement over GPT-4o in sociodemographic-linked decision variation, with several LGBTQIA+ groups flagged for mental-health screening in 100% of cases. Adversarial hallucination rates were higher (65% vs 53% for GPT-4o); a mitigation prompt reduced this to 7.67%.