arXiv:2603.22779v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are equipped with profound semantic knowledge, making them a natural choice for injecting semantic generalization into personalized search systems. However, in practice we find that directly fine-tuning LLMs on industrial personalized tasks (e.g. next item prediction) often yields suboptimal results. We attribute this bottleneck to a critical Knowledge--Action Gap: the inherent conflict between preserving pre-trained semantic knowledge and aligning with specific personalized actions by discriminative objectives. Empirically, action-only training objectives induce Semantic Collapse, such as attention "sinks". This degradation severely cripples the LLM's generalization, failing to bring improvements to personalized search systems. We propose KARMA (Knowledge--Action Regularized Multimodal Alignment), a unified framework that treats semantic reconstruction as a train-only regularizer. KARMA optimizes a next-interest embedding for retrieval (Action) while enforcing semantic decodability (Knowledge) through two complementary objectives: (i) history-conditioned semantic generation, which anchors optimization to the LLM's native next-token distribution, and (ii) embedding-conditioned semantic reconstruction, which constrains the interest embedding to remain semantically recoverable. On Taobao search system, KARMA mitigates semantic collapse (attention-sink analysis) and improves both action metrics and semantic fidelity. In ablations, semantic decodability yields up to +22.5 HR@200. With KARMA, we achieve +0.25 CTR AUC in ranking, +1.86 HR in pre-ranking and +2.51 HR in recalling. Deployed online with low inference overhead at ranking & pre-ranking stage, KARMA drives +0.9% increase in GMV.

arXiv:2603.22779v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are equipped with profound semantic knowledge, making them a natural choice for injecting semantic generalization into personalized search systems. However, in practice we find that directly fine-tuning LLMs on industrial personalized tasks (e.g. next item prediction) often yields suboptimal results. We attribute this bottleneck to a critical Knowledge--Action Gap: the inherent conflict between preserving pre-trained semantic knowledge and aligning with specific personalized actions by discriminative objectives. Empirically, action-only training objectives induce Semantic Collapse, such as attention ``sinks''. This degradation severely cripples the LLM's generalization, failing to bring improvements to personalized search systems. We propose KARMA (Knowledge--Action Regularized Multimodal Alignment), a unified framework that treats semantic reconstruction as a train-only regularizer. KARMA optimizes a next-interest embedding for retrieval (Action) while enforcing semantic decodability (Knowledge) through two complementary objectives: (i) history-conditioned semantic generation, which anchors optimization to the LLM's native next-token distribution, and (ii) embedding-conditioned semantic reconstruction, which constrains the interest embedding to remain semantically recoverable. On Taobao search system, KARMA mitigates semantic collapse (attention-sink analysis) and improves both action metrics and semantic fidelity. In ablations, semantic decodability yields up to +22.5 HR@200. With KARMA, we achieve +0.25 CTR AUC in ranking, +1.86 HR in pre-ranking and +2.51 HR in recalling. Deployed online with low inference overhead at ranking stage, KARMA drives +0.5% increase in Item Click.

arXiv:2509.26354v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled a new class of self-evolving agents that autonomously improve through interaction with the environment, demonstrating strong capabilities. However, self-evolution also introduces novel risks overlooked by current safety research. In this work, we study the case where an agent's self-evolution deviates in unintended ways, leading to undesirable or even harmful outcomes. We refer to this as Misevolution. To provide a systematic investigation, we evaluate misevolution along four key evolutionary pathways: model, memory, tool, and workflow. Our empirical findings reveal that misevolution is a widespread risk, affecting agents built even on top-tier LLMs (e.g., Gemini-2.5-Pro). Different emergent risks are observed in the self-evolutionary process, such as the degradation of safety alignment after memory accumulation, or the unintended introduction of vulnerabilities in tool creation and reuse. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically conceptualize misevolution and provide empirical evidence of its occurrence, highlighting an urgent need for new safety paradigms for self-evolving agents. Finally, we discuss potential mitigation strategies to inspire further research on building safer and more trustworthy self-evolving agents. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/ShaoShuai0605/Misevolution . Warning: this paper includes examples that may be offensive or harmful in nature.