arXiv:2605.26040v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph fraud detection has long depended on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to propagate and aggregate information across relational data. A critical obstacle in practice, however, is that fraudsters frequently disguise themselves by forging numerous connections with benign users, causing fraud signals to be progressively diluted during neighborhood aggregation and undermining detection reliability. While recent efforts have used Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide rich semantic cues for fraud detection, the underlying intent behind suspicious connections remains insufficiently explored. Compounding this issue, the scarcity of annotated fraud samples makes it difficult to train detectors that remain robust under heavy camouflage. To address these gaps, we propose L2IR, an LLM-driven Latent Intent Revealing framework for graph fraud detection. By uncovering latent intent from both user behaviors and suspicious connections, L2IR extracts intent-aware representations from raw behavioral traces and reasons about the true purpose behind individual connections, effectively distinguishing supportive links from misleading ones. It further incorporates adaptive self-training to enhance robustness under limited supervision. Evaluations on two real-world datasets characterized by pervasive camouflage demonstrate that L2IR surpasses strong baselines and can function as a plug-in enhancement for a range of GNN-based detectors, improving AUPRC by up to 8.27%.

arXiv:2510.08558v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A long-term goal of language agents is to learn and improve through their own experience, ultimately outperforming humans in complex, real-world tasks. However, training agents from experience data with reinforcement learning remains difficult in many environments, which either lack verifiable rewards (e.g., websites) or require inefficient long-horizon rollouts (e.g., multi-turn tool use). As a result, most current agents rely on supervised fine-tuning on expert data, which is challenging to scale and generalizes poorly. This limitation stems from the nature of expert demonstrations: they capture only a narrow range of scenarios, and expose the agent to limited environment diversity. We address this limitation with a middle-ground paradigm we call early experience: interaction data generated by the agent's own actions, where the resulting future states serve as supervision without reward signals. Within this paradigm, we study two strategies of using such data: (1) implicit world modeling, which uses collected states to ground the policy in environment dynamics; and (2) self-reflection, where the agent learns from its suboptimal actions to improve reasoning and decision-making. Evaluation across eight diverse environments and multiple model families shows that our approaches consistently improve effectiveness and out-of-domain generalization, highlighting the value of early experience. Moreover, in environments with verifiable rewards, our results provide promising signals that early experience offers a strong foundation for subsequent reinforcement learning, making it a practical bridge between imitation learning and fully experience-driven agents.

arXiv:2605.20251v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing benchmarks for LLM coding agents primarily evaluate final outcomes. While useful for measuring overall capability, these metrics provide limited visibility and often miss defects that arise during execution. We present ProcCtrlBench, a benchmark for execution-process evaluation in LLM coding agents. ProcCtrlBench organizes recurrent execution defects into a reusable ontology covering 11 defect types in 4 categories, and evaluates agent trajectories through standardized process evidence rather than final outcomes alone. To support comparison across heterogeneous agents, ProcCtrlBench standardizes raw logs into a unified trajectory representation and reports calibrated scorecards over process-level findings. In addition, ProcCtrlBench uses control preservation as a way to quantify execution-process quality, capturing whether execution remains interpretable, interruptible, correctable, reversible, and able to hand back authority when needed. We evaluate ProcCtrlBench on 200 cases sampled from three benchmarks: AndroidBench, TerminalBench, and SWE-bench-Verified. Results show that ProcCtrlBench can be instantiated with useful reliability, provides more stable semantics than direct thresholding, and reveals meaningful differences in execution quality that are often overlooked by conventional outcome-based evaluation.