❌

Reading view

AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls

arXiv:2511.22619v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As intelligence increases, so does its shadow. AI deception, in which systems induce false beliefs to secure self-beneficial outcomes, has evolved from a speculative concern to an empirically demonstrated risk across language models, AI agents, and emerging frontier systems. This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field, covering its core concepts, methodologies, genesis, and potential mitigations. First, we identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception. We then review existing empirical studies and associated risks, highlighting deception as a sociotechnical safety challenge. We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment. Deception emergence reveals the mechanisms underlying AI deception: systems with sufficient capability and incentive potential inevitably engage in deceptive behaviors when triggered by external conditions. Deception treatment, in turn, focuses on detecting and addressing such behaviors. On deception emergence, we analyze incentive foundations across three hierarchical levels and identify three essential capability preconditions required for deception. We further examine contextual triggers, including supervision gaps, distributional shifts, and environmental pressures. On deception treatment, we conclude detection methods covering benchmarks and evaluation protocols in static and interactive settings. Building on the three core factors of deception emergence, we outline potential mitigation strategies and propose auditing approaches that integrate technical, community, and governance efforts to address sociotechnical challenges and future AI risks. To support ongoing work in this area, we release a living resource at www.deceptionsurvey.com.
  •  

SciAgent: A Unified Multi-Agent System for Generalistic Scientific Reasoning

arXiv:2511.08151v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent advances in large language models have enabled AI systems to achieve expert-level performance on domain-specific scientific tasks, yet these systems remain narrow and handcrafted. We introduce SciAgent, a unified multi-agent system designed for generalistic scientific reasoning-the ability to adapt reasoning strategies across disciplines and difficulty levels. SciAgent organizes problem solving as a hierarchical process: a Coordinator Agent interprets each problem's domain and complexity, dynamically orchestrating specialized Worker Systems, each composed of interacting reasoning Sub-agents for symbolic deduction, conceptual modeling, numerical computation, and verification. These agents collaboratively assemble and refine reasoning pipelines tailored to each task. Across mathematics and physics Olympiads (IMO, IMC, IPhO, CPhO), SciAgent consistently attains or surpasses human gold-medalist performance, demonstrating both domain generality and reasoning adaptability. Additionally, SciAgent has been tested on the International Chemistry Olympiad (IChO) and selected problems from the Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) benchmark, further confirming the system's ability to generalize across diverse scientific domains. This work establishes SciAgent as a concrete step toward generalistic scientific intelligence-AI systems capable of coherent, cross-disciplinary reasoning at expert levels.
  •  

SciAgent: A Unified Multi-Agent System for Generalistic Scientific Reasoning

arXiv:2511.08151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in large language models have enabled AI systems to achieve expert-level performance on domain-specific scientific tasks, yet these systems remain narrow and handcrafted. We introduce SciAgent, a unified multi-agent system designed for generalistic scientific reasoning-the ability to adapt reasoning strategies across disciplines and difficulty levels. SciAgent organizes problem solving as a hierarchical process: a Coordinator Agent interprets each problem's domain and complexity, dynamically orchestrating specialized Worker Systems, each composed of interacting reasoning Sub-agents for symbolic deduction, conceptual modeling, numerical computation, and verification. These agents collaboratively assemble and refine reasoning pipelines tailored to each task. Across mathematics and physics Olympiads (IMO, IMC, IPhO, CPhO), SciAgent consistently attains or surpasses human gold-medalist performance, demonstrating both domain generality and reasoning adaptability. Additionally, SciAgent has been tested on the International Chemistry Olympiad (IChO) and selected problems from the Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) benchmark, further confirming the system's ability to generalize across diverse scientific domains. This work establishes SciAgent as a concrete step toward generalistic scientific intelligence-AI systems capable of coherent, cross-disciplinary reasoning at expert levels.
  •  

Integrative multi-omics profiling deciphers tumor microenvironment heterogeneity and immunotherapy vulnerabilities in lung neuroendocrine carcinomas

J Adv Res. 2025 Jun 11:S2090-1232(25)00427-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2025.06.017. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Lung neuroendocrine carcinomas (Lu-NECs) are rare, highly aggressive lung tumors with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is crucial towards personalized therapeutic strategies.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to systematically characterize the heterogeneity and complexity of the TIME in Lu-NECs by integrating proteomic, transcriptomic, and genomic data.

METHODS: We performed comprehensive immune-proteomic profiling of 76 Lu-NECs across diverse histopathological subtypes to elucidate intra-tumoral TIME heterogeneity at the proteomic level. Validation was conducted in multiple independent cohorts, including 112 Lu-NECs using immunohistochemistry, 147 Lu-NECs, and 17 small cell lung carcinoma samples using transcriptomics. We integrated proteomic, transcriptomic, genomic, and clinical data to assess molecular, immunological, and clinical features, as well as therapeutic vulnerabilities across different immune subtypes.

RESULTS: We delineated the immuno-proteomic landscape of Lu-NECs and identified two major immuno-proteomic clusters with distinct immunological, molecular, and clinical characteristics. IPC1 was characterized by high immune cell infiltration, while IPC2 exhibited sparse immune cell presence. Genomic analysis revealed distinct mutational patterns, with IPC1 showing a higher incidence of APOBEC-associated mutation signatures and IPC2 being enriched for mutations associated with defective DNA mismatch repair and tobacco-related mutagens. Functional analyses indicated that IPC1 was related to immune and oncogenic signaling activity, whereas IPC2 was associated with cancer stemness and proliferation-related features. Furthermore, IPC1 and IPC2 demonstrated histological subtype-specific clinical benefits from postoperative chemotherapy. Finally, we developed a machine learning model (iPROM) to predict Lu-NECs immune classification and improve risk stratification, which was validated across multiple independent cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS: This study advances the understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment in Lu-NECs through multi-omics characterization and highlights potential personalized therapeutic vulnerabilities tailored to the specific immune landscapes of Lu-NECs.

PMID:40513660 | DOI:10.1016/j.jare.2025.06.017

  •  

Spatial imaging of glycoRNA in single cells with ARPLA

Nature Biotechnology, Published online: 22 May 2023; doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01801-z

GlycoRNA imaging in cells is enabled with a proximity ligation assay.
  •  
❌