Hum Genomics. 2026 Feb 3. doi: 10.1186/s40246-026-00927-w. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is an emerging hallmark of cancer that promotes tumor evolution and heterogeneity. However, the molecular characteristics and clinical significance of ecDNA in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain incompletely understood.

METHODS: The clinical outcomes, genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, tumor microenvironment, and drug target landscapes of ecDNA-negative and ecDNA-positive HCC in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were compared. Next, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random survival forest (RSF) algorithms were used to screen the ecDNA gene signature. A nomogram was constructed and evaluated based on the risk score and clinicopathological features. Finally, the role of DNASE1L3 was validated through in vitro experiments.

RESULTS: EcDNA-positive tumors showed increased vascular invasion, higher AFP levels, and more TP53 mutations. These tumors displayed unique activation of proliferation pathways, decreased stromal infiltration, and heightened immune activation. Our validated six-gene signature (RNF186, BMP6, AOC1, FBLL1, MYBL2, and DNASE1L3) demonstrated strong prognostic value when combined with tumor stage in the nomogram. Notably, DNASE1L3 was downregulated in HCC, showed endothelial cell-specific expression, and suppressed the proliferation and migration of Hep3B2.1-7 cells.

CONCLUSION: Our study characterizes the molecular and clinical distinctions between ecDNA-negative and ecDNA-positive HCC and establishes a clinically applicable gene signature for patient prognosis. These findings advance our understanding of ecDNA-driven tumor heterogeneity and provide potential strategies for personalized HCC management.

PMID:41634868 | DOI:10.1186/s40246-026-00927-w

Front Immunol. 2025 Feb 7;16:1479550. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1479550. eCollection 2025.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To construct a prediction model consisting of metabolites and proteins in peripheral blood plasma to predict whether patients with unresectable stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer can benefit from immunotherapy before it is administered.

METHODS: Peripheral blood plasma was collected from unresectable stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer patients who were negative for driver mutations before receiving immunotherapy. Then we classified samples according to the follow-up results after two courses of immunotherapy and non-targeted metabolomics and proteomics analyses were performed to select different metabolites and proteins. Finally, potential biomarkers were picked out by applying machine learning methods including random forest and stepwise regression and prediction models were constructed by logistic regression.

RESULTS: The presence of metabolites and proteins in peripheral blood plasma was causally associated with both non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1/PD-1 expression levels. A total of 2 differential metabolites including 5-sulfooxymethylfurfural and Anthranilic acid and 2 differential proteins including Immunoglobulin heavy variable 1-45 and Microfibril-associated glycoprotein 4 were selected as reliable biomarkers. The area under the curve (AUC) of the prediction model built on clinical risks was merely 0.659. The AUC of metabolomics prediction model was 0.977 and the AUC of proteomics was 0.875 while the AUC of the integrative-omics prediction model was 0.955.

CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic and protein biomarkers in peripheral blood both have high efficacy and reliability in the prediction of immunotherapy sensitivity in unresectable stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer, but validation in larger population-based cohorts is still needed.

PMID:39991162 | PMC:PMC11842339 | DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1479550