❌

Reading view

Demystifying the Roles of LLM Layers in Retrieval, Knowledge, and Reasoning

arXiv:2510.02091v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent studies suggest that the deeper layers of Large Language Models (LLMs) contribute little to representation learning and can often be removed without significant performance loss. However, such claims are typically drawn from narrow evaluations and may overlook important aspects of model behavior. In this work, we present a systematic study of depth utilization across diverse dimensions, including evaluation protocols, task categories, and model architectures. Our analysis confirms that very deep layers are generally less effective than earlier ones, but their contributions vary substantially with the evaluation setting. Under likelihood-based metrics without generation, pruning most layers preserves performance, with only the initial few being critical. By contrast, generation-based evaluation uncovers indispensable roles for middle and deeper layers in enabling reasoning and maintaining long-range coherence. We further find that knowledge and retrieval are concentrated in shallow components, whereas reasoning accuracy relies heavily on deeper layers -- yet can be reshaped through distillation. These results highlight that depth usage in LLMs is highly heterogeneous and context-dependent, underscoring the need for task-, metric-, and model-aware perspectives in both interpreting and compressing large models.
  •  

Demystifying the Roles of LLM Layers in Retrieval, Knowledge, and Reasoning

arXiv:2510.02091v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent studies suggest that the deeper layers of Large Language Models (LLMs) contribute little to representation learning and can often be removed without significant performance loss. However, such claims are typically drawn from narrow evaluations and may overlook important aspects of model behavior. In this work, we present a systematic study of depth utilization across diverse dimensions, including evaluation protocols, task categories, and model architectures. Our analysis confirms that very deep layers are generally less effective than earlier ones, but their contributions vary substantially with the evaluation setting. Under likelihood-based metrics without generation, pruning most layers preserves performance, with only the initial few being critical. By contrast, generation-based evaluation uncovers indispensable roles for middle and deeper layers in enabling reasoning and maintaining long-range coherence. We further find that knowledge and retrieval are concentrated in shallow components, whereas reasoning accuracy relies heavily on deeper layers -- yet can be reshaped through distillation. These results highlight that depth usage in LLMs is highly heterogeneous and context-dependent, underscoring the need for task-, metric-, and model-aware perspectives in both interpreting and compressing large models.
  •  

Development of a Serum Proteomic-Based Diagnostic Model for Lung Cancer Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Unveiling the Role of SLC16A4 in Tumor Progression and Immune Response

Biomolecules. 2025 Jul 26;15(8):1081. doi: 10.3390/biom15081081.

ABSTRACT

Early diagnosis of lung cancer is crucial for improving patient prognosis. In this study, we developed a diagnostic model for lung cancer based on serum proteomic data from the GSE168198 dataset using four machine learning algorithms (nnet, glmnet, svm, and XGBoost). The model's performance was validated on datasets that included normal controls, disease controls, and lung cancer data containing both. Furthermore, the model's diagnostic capability was further validated on an independent external dataset. Our analysis identified SLC16A4 as a key protein in the model, which was significantly downregulated in lung cancer serum samples compared to normal controls. The expression of SLC16A4 was closely associated with clinical pathological features such as gender, tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, and smoking history. Functional assays revealed that overexpression of SLC16A4 significantly inhibited lung cancer cell proliferation and induced cellular senescence, suggesting its potential role in lung cancer development. Additionally, correlation analyses showed that SLC16A4 expression was linked to immune cell infiltration and the expression of immune checkpoint genes, indicating its potential involvement in immune escape mechanisms. Based on multi-omics data from the TCGA database, we further discovered that the low expression of SLC16A4 in lung cancer may be regulated by DNA copy number variations and DNA methylation. In conclusion, this study not only established an efficient diagnostic model for lung cancer but also identified SLC16A4 as a promising biomarker with potential applications in early diagnosis and immunotherapy.

PMID:40867526 | PMC:PMC12383841 | DOI:10.3390/biom15081081

  •  

Advances in molecular pathology and therapy of non-small cell lung cancer

Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025 Jun 15;10(1):186. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02243-6.

ABSTRACT

Over the past two decades, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has witnessed encouraging advancements in basic and clinical research. However, substantial unmet needs remain for patients worldwide, as drug resistance persists as an inevitable reality. Meanwhile, the journey towards amplifying the breadth and depth of the therapeutic effect requires comprehending and integrating diverse and profound progress. In this review, therefore, we aim to comprehensively present such progress that spans the various aspects of molecular pathology, encompassing elucidations of metastatic mechanisms, identification of therapeutic targets, and dissection of spatial omics. Additionally, we also highlight the numerous small molecule and antibody drugs, encompassing their application alone or in combination, across later-line, frontline, neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings. Then, we elaborate on drug resistance mechanisms, mainly involving targeted therapies and immunotherapies, revealed by our proposed theoretical models to clarify interactions between cancer cells and a variety of non-malignant cells, as well as almost all the biological regulatory pathways. Finally, we outline mechanistic perspectives to pursue innovative treatments of NSCLC, through leveraging artificial intelligence to incorporate the latest insights into the design of finely-tuned, biomarker-driven combination strategies. This review not only provides an overview of the various strategies of how to reshape available armamentarium, but also illustrates an example of clinical translation of how to develop novel targeted drugs, to revolutionize therapeutic landscape for NSCLC.

PMID:40517166 | PMC:PMC12167388 | DOI:10.1038/s41392-025-02243-6

  •  

Multiple time points for detecting circulating tumor DNA to monitor the response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13526-0.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Not all breast cancer (BC) patients can benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). A poor response may result in patients missing the best opportunity for treatment, ultimately leading to a poor prognosis. Thus, to identify an effective predictor that can assess and predict patient response at early time points, we focused on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), which is a vital noninvasive liquid biopsy biomarker. We performed a meta-analysis to explore the predictive value of response by monitoring ctDNA at four time points of NAT using pathologic complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB).

METHODS: By searching Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science until December 24, 2023, we selected studies concerning the relationship between ctDNA and response or prognosis. We analysed the results at the following various time points: baseline (T0), first cycle of NAT (T1), mid-treatment (MT), and end of NAT (EOT). pCR and RCB were used to evaluate the response as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was to investigate the relationship between ctDNA and prognosis. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were used as effect indicators.

RESULTS: Thirteen reports from twelve studies were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that ctDNA negativity was associated with pCR at T1 (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.57), MT (OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.20-0.60), and EOT (OR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.22-0.66). When RCB was used to evaluate responses, ctDNA negativity was associated with RCB-0/I at the MT (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.55) and EOT (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.15-0.46). Furthermore, ctDNA positivity at T1 predicted a worse prognosis for patients (HR = 2.73; 95% CI: 1.29-5.75). We also performed a subgroup analysis to more accurately assess the predictive value of ctDNA for triple-negative breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that the ctDNA status at the early stage of NAT can predict patient response, which provides evidence for adjusting personalized treatment strategies and improving patient survival.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024496465.

PMID:39844103 | PMC:PMC11752932 | DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13526-0

  •  
❌