J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 12. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02197-6. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a formidable health challenge due to its detection at a late stage and a lack of reliable biomarkers for early detection. Although levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 are often used in conjunction with imaging-based tests to aid in the diagnosis of PDAC, there is still a need for more sensitive and specific biomarkers for early detection of PDAC.

METHODS: We obtained serum samples from 88 subjects (patients with PDAC (n = 58) and controls (n = 30)). We carried out a multi-omics analysis to measure cytokines and related proteins using proximity extension technology and lipidomics and metabolomics using tandem mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis was carried out to find molecular alterations in patients with PDAC and a machine learning model was used to derive a molecular signature of PDAC.

RESULTS: We quantified 1,462 circulatory proteins along with 873 lipids and 1,001 metabolites. A total of 505 proteins, 186 metabolites and 33 lipids including bone marrow stromal antigen 2 (BST2), keratin 18 (KRT18), and cholesteryl ester(20:5) were found to be significantly altered in patients. We identified different levels of sphingosine, sphinganine, urobilinogen and lactose indicating that glycosphingolipid and galactose metabolisms were significantly altered in patients compared to controls. In addition, elevated levels of diacylglycerols and decreased cholesteryl esters were observed in patients. Using a machine learning model, we identified a signature of 38 biomarkers for PDAC, composed of 21 proteins, 4 lipids, and 13 metabolites.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study identified several proteins, metabolites and lipids involved in various pathways including cholesterol and lipid metabolism to be changing in patients. In addition, we discovered a multi-analyte signature that could be further tested for detection of PDAC.

PMID:39666045 | DOI:10.1007/s00535-024-02197-6

Mol Cancer. 2024 Nov 19;23(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-02174-w.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers have revolutionized the management of colorectal cancer (CRC), facilitating early detection, prevention, personalized treatment, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. This review explores current CRC screening strategies and emerging biomarker applications.

MAIN BODY: We summarize the landscape of non-invasive CRC screening and MRD detection strategies, discuss the limitations of the current approaches, and highlight the promising potential of novel biomarker solutions. The fecal immunochemical test remained the cornerstone of CRC screening, but its sensitivity has been improved by assays that combined its performance with other stool analytes. However, their sensitivity for advanced adenomas and the patient compliance both remain suboptimal. Blood-based tests promise to increase compliance but require further refinement to compete with stool-based biomarker tests. The ideal scenario involves leveraging blood tests to increase screening participation, and simultaneously promote stool- and endoscopy-based screening among those who are compliant. Once solely reliant on upfront surgery followed by stage and pathology-driven adjuvant chemotherapy, the treatment of stage II and III colon cancer has undergone a revolutionary transformation with the advent of MRD testing after surgery. A decade ago, the concept of using a post-surgical test instead of stage and pathology to determine the need for adjuvant chemotherapy was disruptive. Today, a blood test may be more informative of the need for chemotherapy than the stage at diagnosis.

CONCLUSION: Biomarker research is not just improving, but bringing a transformative change to CRC clinical management. Early detection is not just getting better, but improving thanks to a multi-modality approach, and personalized treatment plans are not just becoming a reality, but a promising future with MRD testing.

PMID:39558327 | PMC:PMC11575410 | DOI:10.1186/s12943-024-02174-w

J Thorac Oncol. 2024 Sep;19(9):1272-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.05.006. Epub 2024 May 16.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Electronic nose (E-nose) technology has reported excellent sensitivity and specificity in the setting of lung cancer screening. However, the performance of E-nose specifically for early-stage tumors remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of E-nose technology in clinical stage I lung cancer.

METHODS: This phase IIc trial (NCT04734145) included patients diagnosed with a single greater than or equal to 50% solid stage I nodule. Exhalates were prospectively collected from January 2020 to August 2023. Blinded bioengineers analyzed the exhalates, using E-nose technology to determine the probability of malignancy. Patients were stratified into three risk groups (low-risk, [<0.2]; moderate-risk, [≥0.2-0.7]; high-risk, [≥0.7]). The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of E-nose versus histopathology (accuracy and F1 score). The secondary outcome was the clinical performance of the E-nose versus clinicoradiological prediction models.

RESULTS: Based on the predefined cutoff (<0.20), E-nose agreed with histopathologic results in 86% of cases, achieving an F1 score of 92.5%, based on 86 true positives, two false negatives, and 12 false positives (n = 100). E-nose would refer fewer patients with malignant nodules to observation (low-risk: 2 versus 9 and 11, respectively; p = 0.028 and p = 0.011) than would the Swensen and Brock models and more patients with malignant nodules to treatment without biopsy (high-risk: 27 versus 19 and 6, respectively; p = 0.057 and p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of clinical stage I lung cancer, E-nose agrees well with histopathology. Accordingly, E-nose technology can be used in addition to imaging or as part of a "multiomics" platform.

PMID:38762120 | PMC:PMC11380592 | DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2024.05.006

Eur J Radiol. 2024 Dec;181:111796. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111796. Epub 2024 Oct 21.

ABSTRACT

Liquid biopsy with sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a minimally invasive method for sampling body fluids and offers a promising alternative to tissue biopsies that involve greater risks, costs, and time. ctDNA not only identifies actionable targets by revealing unique molecular signatures in cancer, but also may assess treatment response, treatment resistance and progression, and recurrence. Imaging correlates of these applications are already being identified and utilized for various solid tumors. Radiologists have new challenges in interpreting oncologic imaging. Given their integral role in cancer surveillance, they must become familiar with the importance of ctDNA in detecting recurrence and minimal residual disease, measuring treatment response, predicting survival and metastatic patterns, and identifying new molecular therapeutic targets. In this review, we provide an overview of ctDNA testing, and a snapshot of current clinical guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society of Molecular Oncology on the use of ctDNA in lung, breast, colorectal, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary cancers. For each cancer type, we also highlight current research applications of ctDNA that are relevant to the field of diagnostic radiology.

PMID:39461058 | DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111796

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 29;15(13):3418. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133418.

ABSTRACT

The clinical management of patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules is associated with unintended harm to patients and better methods are required to more precisely quantify lung cancer risk in this group. Here, we combine multiple noninvasive approaches to more accurately identify lung cancer in indeterminate pulmonary nodules. We analyzed 94 quantitative radiomic imaging features and 41 qualitative semantic imaging variables with molecular biomarkers from blood derived from an antibody-based microarray platform that determines protein, cancer-specific glycan, and autoantibody-antigen complex content with high sensitivity. From these datasets, we created a PSR (plasma, semantic, radiomic) risk prediction model comprising nine blood-based and imaging biomarkers with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.964 that when tested in a second, independent cohort yielded an AUROC of 0.846. Incorporating known clinical risk factors (age, gender, and smoking pack years) for lung cancer into the PSR model improved the AUROC to 0.897 in the second cohort and was more accurate than a well-characterized clinical risk prediction model (AUROC = 0.802). Our findings support the use of a multi-omics approach to guide the clinical management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

PMID:37444527 | PMC:PMC10341085 | DOI:10.3390/cancers15133418