Smoking has severe health consequences, and secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among children increases the risk of sudden infant death syndrome, chronic respiratory diseases, such as asthma, and lung cancer in adulthood. For many parents, pediatricians are the primary source of interaction with the healthcare system. Nevertheless, in pediatric settings, appropriate tobacco treatments are rarely, if ever, provided to parents who smoke. To best address tobacco use among parents, it is ideal to develop scalable solutions that are coordinated across health systems, community partners, and national services within pediatric settings. We describe our experience developing and implementing a parent tobacco treatment platform (PTTP) within a pediatric institution that leverages multiple international standards to support interoperability, with the overarching goal of providing a model for how such work can be approached. The clinical decision support (CDS) system includes clinician- and patient-facing components, connects parents to three different treatment options (nicotine replacement therapy, text-based counseling, and telephonic counseling), and incorporates three international standards (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources [FHIR], SMART on FHIR, and CDS Hooks). FHIR is used across all components. SMART on FHIR is limited to the clinician-facing tool, and CDS Hooks is used in the patient-facing portion. While healthcare interoperability standards supported a significant portion of the overall system, non-standard technologies and enhancements of existing standards were also required. Further, no connections with community partners could use existing interoperability standards. Over one year, the CDS was used in 194,946 visits, identified 7,847 parents who smoke, and connected 2,954 parents to 6,320 distinct treatment services, a significant improvement compared to prior efforts. Our project demonstrates that building CDS systems using international standards, such as SMART on FHIR, FHIR, and CDS Hooks, is possible, but challenges remain. Limits in the CDS Hooks standard to support common workflows and a lack of communication standards used by 3rd parties outside the healthcare system represent areas for future work. To support these requirements, additional EHR-specific records and communication mechanisms were required.