MedComm (2020). 2025 May 15;6(6):e70193. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70193. eCollection 2025 Jun.

ABSTRACT

Minimal residual disease (MRD) serves as a pivotal biomarker for the clinical diagnosis and subsequent treatment of cancer patients. In hematological malignancies, MRD pose an increasingly serious threat to the health of Chinese people. Accurate MRD detection is essential for assessing relapse risk and optimizing therapeutic strategies, yet current methods such as flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) each have distinct limitations, and significant gaps remain in achieving optimal sensitivity and specificity of these technologies. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of MRD detection methods, high-lighting their clinical implications, including their roles in treatment decision-making, risk stratification, and patient outcomes. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of existing techniques and explores emerging technologies that promise enhanced diagnostic precision. Key advancements such as integrating NGS with other methodologies and novel approaches like liquid biopsy and PCR are examined. The review underscores the academic and practical value of early and accurate MRD detection, emphasizing its impact on improving patient management and treatment outcomes. By addressing the limitations of current technologies and exploring future directions, this review aims to advance the field and support personalized medicine approaches to cancer treatment.

PMID:40384986 | PMC:PMC12079024 | DOI:10.1002/mco2.70193

Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(20):e70346. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70346.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For early detection and postoperative monitoring of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), the traditional detection method was limited to its invasiveness and insufficient sensitivity. We aim to use urine tumour DNA (utDNA) for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD), early diagnosis and perioperative monitoring in UTUC.

METHOD: We previously established a utDNA multidimensional bioinformatic valuation model, named utLIFE, using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing and targeted deep sequencing. This prospective cohort enrolled 93 patients diagnosed with UTUC without metastasis. We collected morning urine samples on the day of surgery and the discharge day after the operation for utLIFE testing. In addition, we also enrolled 80 healthy controls to further validate the specificity of the utLIFE model in the study.

RESULTS: The utLIFE of preoperative samples could discriminate UTUC with high specificity (96.25%, 77/80), and high sensitivity (96.77%, 90/93) regardless of stage and grade. The sensitivity of utLIFE was significantly higher than urine cytology (p < 0.001) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) (p < 0.001) (N = 19), especially in early-stage and low-grade UTUC. Postoperative utLIFE scores were significantly decreased compared with those of preoperative samples (79 vs. 36, p < 0.001), indicating its association with tumour burden. For special pathology types, utLIFE performed less well in sensitivity and perioperative alteration.

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we established a bioinformatic utDNA valuation model, utLIFE, which was validated to be a rapid and noninvasive approach with high sensitivity for early detection and MRD monitoring for UTUC.

PMID:39440792 | PMC:PMC11497171 | DOI:10.1002/cam4.70346