❌

Reading view

Advancement in hepatocellular carcinoma research: Biomarkers, therapeutics approaches and impact of artificial intelligence

Comput Biol Med. 2025 Nov;198(Pt A):111120. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111120. Epub 2025 Sep 29.

ABSTRACT

Cancer is a leading, highly complex, and deadly disease that has become a major concern in modern medicine. Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary liver cancer and a leading cause of global cancer mortality. Its development is predominantly associated with chronic liver diseases such as hepatitis B and C infections, cirrhosis, alcohol consumption, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Molecular mechanisms underlying HCC involve genetic mutations, epigenetic changes, and disrupted signalling pathways, including Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/AKT/mTOR. Early diagnosis remains challenging, as most cases are detected at advanced stages, limiting curative treatment options. Diagnostic advancements, including biomarkers like alpha-fetoprotein and cutting-edge imaging techniques such as CT, MRI, and ultrasound-based radiomics, have improved early detection. Treatment strategies depend on the disease stage, ranging from curative options like surgical resection and liver transplantation to palliative therapies, including transarterial chemoembolization, systemic therapies, and immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 have shown promise for advanced HCC. In this review we discuss about emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and multi-omics platforms for HCC management by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, identifying novel therapeutic targets, and enabling personalized treatments. Despite these advancements, the prognosis for HCC patients remains poor, underscoring the need for continued research into early detection, innovative therapies, and translational applications to effectively address this global health challenge.

PMID:41027344 | DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111120

  •  

The tumour microenvironment in pancreatic cancer - new clinical challenges, but more opportunities

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Oct 3. doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-01077-z. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Patients with advanced-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) predominantly receive chemotherapy, and despite initial responses in some patients, most will have disease progression and often dismal outcomes. This lack of clinical effectiveness partly reflects not only cancer cell-intrinsic factors but also the presence of a tumour microenvironment (TME) that precludes access of both systemic therapies and circulating immune cells to the primary tumour, as well as supporting the growth of PDAC cells. Combined with improved preclinical models of PDAC, advances in single-cell spatial multi-omics and machine learning-based models have provided novel methods of untangling the complexities of the TME. In this Review, we focus on the desmoplastic stroma and both the intratumoural and intertumoural heterogeneity of PDAC, with an emphasis on cancer-associated fibroblasts and their surrounding immune cell niches. We describe new approaches in converting the immunologically 'cold' PDAC TME into a 'hot' TME by priming T cell activation, overcoming T cell exhaustion and unravelling myeloid cell-mediated immunosuppression. Furthermore, we explore integrated targets involving the TME, such as points of convergence among tumour, stromal and immune cell metabolism as well as oncogenic KRAS signalling. Finally, building on our experience with failed clinical trials in the past, we consider how this evolving comprehensive understanding of the TME will ensure future success in developing more effective therapies for patients with PDAC.

PMID:41044427 | DOI:10.1038/s41571-025-01077-z

  •  

Clinical validation of an AI-based blood testing device for diagnosis and prognosis of acute infection and sepsis

Nature Medicine, Published online: 30 September 2025; doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03933-y

In a prospective study enrolling 1,222 patients from 22 emergency departments, a device using a machine-learning-based signature of blood mRNAs demonstrated clinically acceptable performance to diagnose bacterial and viral infections and to predict the all-cause need for critical care interventions within 7 days, with benchmark to established biomarkers and risk scores.
  •  

Exploring Attitudes and Obstacles Around Digital Public Health Tools: Insights From a Statewide Cross-Sectional Survey on Washington’s Vaccine Verification System

Background: Development and use of digital public health tools surged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among these tools, vaccine verification systems emerged as alternatives to paper vaccine records, aiming to help limit the spread of disease. In November 2021, the Washington State Department of Health launched “WA Verify,” a QR code–based vaccine verification system built on the SMART Health Card framework, providing residents with a convenient way to store and share proof of vaccination digitally. However, WA Verify was developed and deployed before assessments and public input regarding potential adoption challenges—such as concerns about privacy, surveillance, data sharing, trust in the technology, and the managing organizations—could be completed. Objective: This analysis used statewide survey data from Washington to identify and characterize barriers and facilitators to the adoption of WA Verify, and to understand how factors such as data privacy, security, attitudes toward public health policies and communication, and technological proficiency may influence acceptance and uptake of digital public health tools. Methods: A cross-sectional statewide survey was distributed between September 2022 and January 2023 to a random sample of 5000 Washington households. Respondents were categorized into 3 groups based on their responses indicating WA Verify “users,” “potential users,” or “unlikely users.” Comparisons were made between groups regarding experiences with and opinions on COVID-19 vaccine and test verification, public health policies, communication, digital tools, technological proficiency, sociodemographic characteristics, and health history. Poststratification weights were applied to reduce nonresponse bias. Results: Of the 1401 respondents, 359 (25.6% unweighted, 25.8% weighted) were users, 662 (47.3% unweighted, 49.8% weighted) were potential users, and 380 (27.1% unweighted, 24.4% weighted) were unlikely users. All percentages reported are based on weighted data. Compared with users and potential users, unlikely users were more likely to oppose policies requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination or negative test results (users: 6.0%, potential users: 13.6%, unlikely users: 65.9%). Unlikely users were more likely to cite concerns about personal health data security and phone hacking or tracking, though these concerns were also notable among potential users and users. Users and potential users were more likely to perceive a digital vaccine verification system as convenient (users: 96.5%, potential users: 92.3%, unlikely users: 38.1%) and indicated openness to receiving relevant information from a range of sources. Unlikely users were more likely to report not owning a smartphone and demonstrated lower technological proficiency (users: 12.3%, potential users: 15.9%, unlikely users: 32.3%), indicating a technological divide between groups. Conclusions: While nearly three-quarters of respondents had either already adopted or were willing to adopt a tool like WA Verify, concerns about data security, lower technological proficiency, and distrust of public health characterized those least likely to adopt such tools. Identifying barriers to adoption among “unlikely users” is essential for developing effective communication strategies—such as targeted marketing and community engagement—to improve adoption and ensure equitable access to public health technologies.
  •  
❌