❌

Reading view

Decoding the tumor immune microenvironment in lung squamous cell carcinoma: characteristics, regulatory mechanisms, and future directions in immunotherapy

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Sep 30;14(9):4112-4130. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-350. Epub 2025 Sep 18.

ABSTRACT

Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), a predominant type of lung cancer, is marked by an unfavorable prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Unlike lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), LUSC exhibits few driver mutations, resulting in minimal benefits from targeted therapies for these patients. Despite the transformative effects of immunotherapy on patient outcomes, only a subset of patients achieving durable responses. This heterogeneity in treatment outcomes is increasingly attributed to the complex feature of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in LUSC. The TIME of LUSC is a highly dynamic ecosystem composed of diverse immune cell populations and stromal components that collectively foster an immune-evasive niche. Recent breakthroughs in multi-omics technologies, particularly single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial omics, have provided unprecedented resolution in dissecting the cellular and molecular architecture of the TIME in LUSC. These technologies have enabled the identification of distinct immune cells and their spatial interactions with the tumor, shedding light on the mechanisms underlying immune evasion and resistance to immunotherapy. Building on these advancements, this review establishes a new classification of the TIME which may guide patient stratification and personalized immunotherapy. And we comprehensively offer a detailed examination of the principal characteristics and regulatory mechanisms of the TIME, highlighting potential immunotherapeutic strategies tailored to this distinct immunological context.

PMID:41133013 | PMC:PMC12541881 | DOI:10.21037/tlcr-2025-350

  •  

Biomarkers for non-small cell lung cancer risk using multi-omics approaches: a nested case-control study

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Sep 30;14(9):3645-3658. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-603. Epub 2025 Sep 25.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer poses a major public health challenge, accounting for the highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. This study aimed to identify non-invasive biomarkers for the early detection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) risk.

METHODS: We randomly selected 150 incident NSCLC cases during follow-up from the Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II. Controls (n=150) were matched to cases by age, gender, and the time of blood collection. Non-targeted metabolite screening by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC)/mass spectrometry (MS) was conducted on the pre-diagnostic biological samples. The 11 reported lung cancer-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Koreans were extracted from DNA genotyping data of the study population. Metabolite markers related to NSCLC risk were identified through clustering using hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise. The associations between smoking, dietary factors, and NSCLC were also examined.

RESULTS: Six discriminative serum metabolites were identified as having an association with NSCLC incidence. Notably, the relationship between specific metabolite levels and NSCLC risk differed by rs7086803 genotype. Smoking status and occupational exposures appear to influence specific metabolite profiles, while dietary vegetable intake may modulate the risk of NSCLC among smokers.

CONCLUSIONS: The meaningful biomarkers revealed in the current research could be used to enhance the predictive ability for NSCLC risk. Furthermore, we suggest that the protective role of dietary vegetables against NSCLC may be attenuated or absent in smokers.

PMID:41133005 | PMC:PMC12541849 | DOI:10.21037/tlcr-2025-603

  •  

Best Practices for Data Modernization Across the United States Public Health System: Scoping Review

Background: The adoption of new technologies and data modernization approaches in public health aims to enhance the use of health data to inform decision-making and improve population health. However, public health departments struggle with legacy systems, siloed data, and privacy concerns, hampering new technology adoption and data sharing with stakeholders. This paper maps how to address these shortcomings by identifying data modernization challenges, initiatives, and progress. Objective: To characterize the evidence for data modernization associated gaps and best practices in public health. Methods: This scoping review was conducted using the five-stage framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley and was reported according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A structured search was performed in databases PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and was complemented by a further search in the Google Scholar search engine, covering publications from January 1, 2019, to April 30, 2024. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, published in English, and focused on data modernization initiatives within U.S. public health and reported on best practices, challenges, and outcomes. Search terms combined concepts such as “Data Modernization,” “Interoperability,” and “Public Health” using Boolean operators. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts using Rayyan QCRI, with conflicts resolved through consultation with a third reviewer. Data was extracted into Microsoft Excel and thematically analyzed. Results: This review analyzed 22 studies focused on public health data modernization. Across the literature, common components included transitioning to cloud-based systems, consolidating fragmented data into unified platforms, applying governance frameworks, and implementing analytics tools to support decision-making. Primary data sources were electronic health records, insurance claims, and disease surveillance registries. Key challenges identified across studies involved data quality issues, lack of interoperability, and limited resources, particularly in underfunded settings. Notable benefits included more timely and accessible data, improved integration across systems, and enhanced analytical capabilities, which collectively support more responsive and effective public health interventions when guided by clear standards and policy alignment. Conclusions: Progress hinges on balancing local adaptability with national coordination, improving data governance practices, and enhancing collaboration across institutions. These steps are vital to ensure public health systems can deliver timely, accurate, and actionable information to support effective public health efforts.
  •  

Opinion: How much should healthy medical research volunteers get paid?

Below is a lightly edited, AI-generated transcript of the “First Opinion Podcast” interview with Jake Eberts and Jill Fisher. Be sure to sign up for the weekly “First Opinion Podcast” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Get alerts about each new episode by signing up for the “First Opinion Podcast” newsletter. And don’t forget to sign up for the First Opinion newsletter, delivered every Sunday.

Torie Bosch: Jake Eberts did not die of dysentery. But he did catch it for science. How much would you have to be paid to risk a bout with a disease that most Americans associate with the Oregon Trail?

Read the rest…

  •  
❌