Reading view
Adaptive Data Flywheel: Applying MAPE Control Loops to AI Agent Improvement
Glia: A Human-Inspired AI for Automated Systems Design and Optimization
An In-depth Study of LLM Contributions to the Bin Packing Problem
VeriMoA: A Mixture-of-Agents Framework for Spec-to-HDL Generation
Impact of clinical decision support systems (cdss) on clinical outcomes and healthcare delivery in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Frame Semantic Patterns for Identifying Underreporting of Notifiable Events in Healthcare: The Case of Gender-Based Violence
MARIA: A Framework for Marginal Risk Assessment without Ground Truth in AI Systems
MemeArena: Automating Context-Aware Unbiased Evaluation of Harmfulness Understanding for Multimodal Large Language Models
Can LLMs Help You at Work? A Sandbox for Evaluating LLM Agents in Enterprise Environments
Best Practices for Biorisk Evaluations on Open-Weight Bio-Foundation Models
A Systematic Literature Review of Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Network Models for Time Series Forecasting and Classification
Artificial Empathy: AI based Mental Health
Deep Learning-based Prediction of Clinical Trial Enrollment with Uncertainty Estimates
A Process Mining-Based System For The Analysis and Prediction of Software Development Workflows
On the limitation of evaluating machine unlearning using only a single training seed
International expert consensus on the clinical integration of circulating tumor cells in solid tumors
Eur J Cancer. 2025 Dec 9;231:116050. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116050. Epub 2025 Oct 20.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a versatile biomarker in solid tumors. Extensive research supports their clinical relevance and led to regulatory approval in breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. However, clinical adoption remains limited mainly due to the lack of consensus and standardized technologies. Additionally, CTC research lacks unified direction. To address these gaps, an international expert panel was established to assess the current and future clinical utility of CTCs.
METHODS: A panel of 11 CTC experts identified key areas of controversy, informing a structured survey distributed to 55 international multidisciplinary experts. Consensus was predefined as ≥ 70 % agreement. Areas without consensus were discussed in a virtual meeting, leading to final statements on the clinical integration of CTCs.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven experts completed the survey. Consensus was reached on the clinical utility of CTCs for prognosis and treatment monitoring in metastatic breast (BC) and prostate (PC) cancers, including AR-V7 testing in metastatic castration-resistant PC for therapy selection. In other tumors, CTCs remain investigational. Experts agreed that while clinical utility is not yet established in early-stage disease, CTCs show promise in early BC, especially combined with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for minimal residual disease detection. CellSearch® is currently the only platform with high-level evidence for clinical use, though emerging technologies are promising. Key challenges include improving detection sensitivity/specificity, standardizing workflows, generating robust data, and clinician education. Experts emphasized shifting from enumeration to phenotypic and molecular characterization, particularly for treatment guidance, and highlighted the complementary role of CTCs and cfDNA, advocating for integrated liquid biopsy approaches.
CONCLUSIONS: This consensus offers practical guidance for clinical integration of CTCs and outlines strategic research priorities to unlock their full potential in precision oncology.
PMID:41172567 | DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116050