arXiv:2609.07316v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Due to the proliferation of vehicle trajectory data enabled by advanced sensing technologies, path representation learning has become a pivotal task in intelligent transportation systems. Although existing self-supervised approaches have achieved promising performance, their dependence on deterministic contrastive learning paradigms and handcrafted view augmentation strategies inherently restricts their cross-scenario generalization capabilities. To address these limitations, we present DGCPath, an innovative Distribution-aware Generative Contrastive learning framework for Path representation. This framework establishes a synergistic connection between generative modeling and distributional contrastive learning, enabling the acquisition of robust and transferable feature embeddings. Specifically, our framework incorporates: (1) a diffusion-based view generator that autonomously produces semantically coherent yet diverse trajectory views from Gaussian noise; (2) a variational contrastive mechanism that enforces latent feature alignment at the distribution level, transcending conventional instance-wise consistency; and (3) a novel generative cross-supervision module that reinforces view-level consistency through cross-view reconstruction learning. Comprehensive evaluations on three real-world trajectory datasets demonstrate that DGCPath outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on two distinct downstream tasks, validating its enhanced generalization capability and representation effectiveness.

arXiv:2605.02010v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This position paper argues that reliable AI requires infrastructure for human validation of implicit knowledge. AI learns from both explicit knowledge (papers, documentation, structured databases) and implicit knowledge (reasoning patterns, debugging processes, intermediate steps). Implicit knowledge remains unexternalized because documentation cost exceeds perceived value -- yet AI learns from it indiscriminately, acquiring both beneficial patterns and harmful biases. Current reliability methods can only verify explicit knowledge against sources, creating a fundamental gap: the most valuable AI capabilities (reasoning, judgment, intuition) are precisely those we cannot verify. We propose Knowledge Objects (KOs) -- structured artifacts that externalize implicit knowledge into forms humans can inspect, verify, and endorse. KOs transform verification economics: what was previously too costly to verify becomes feasible, enabling accumulated human validation to improve reliability over time.