arXiv:2605.25399v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Objective: Survival analysis is central to medical prediction, yet large language models (LLMs) are rarely used as end-to-end survival models because censoring prevents straightforward supervised fine-tuning. Here we present LLMSurvival, a framework that enables censoring-aware survival analysis with unmodified LLMs operating directly on tabular clinical data. Materials and Methods: LLMSurvival reformulates time-to-event prediction as pairwise ranking among comparable subjects, and derives test-time risk by aggregating comparisons against anchor individuals from the training cohort. Results: Across two clinical tasks (ICU mortality prediction in MIMIC-IV and fragility fracture prediction in a NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine cohort), LLMSurvival improves overall concordance over Cox proportional hazards modeling by 3.1% for ICU mortality and 0.5% for fracture risk, 2.1% on average for ICU mortality and 2.8% for fracture risk over three established deep learning survival models. Discussion: The results show that survival modeling with censoring can be made compatible with LLM fine-tuning through comparison-based reformulation. The framework demonstrates high portability and superior performance over expert curated scores like SAPS-II and FRAX scores across diverse clinical context. Furthermore, the framework supports local deployment, as compact, publicly available base models provide sufficient performance. Conclusion: The LLMSurvival framework serves as a proof of concept for an integrated, censoring-conscious approach to survival analysis via LLMs.

Nature Medicine, Published online: 22 May 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04438-y

Will medical trainees who rely on AI fail to develop foundational independent clinical reasoning? This Perspective outlines a precautionary framework to preserve foundational competence while supporting safe and effective AI integration in medical training.

arXiv:2604.03893v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Breakthroughs in frontier theory often depend on the combination of concrete diagrammatic notations with rigorous logic. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show promise in general scientific tasks, current benchmarks often focus on local information extraction rather than the global structural logic inherent in formal scientific notations. In this work, we introduce FeynmanBench, the first benchmark centered on Feynman diagram tasks. It is designed to evaluate AI's capacity for multistep diagrammatic reasoning, which requires satisfying conservation laws and symmetry constraints, identifying graph topology, converting between diagrammatic and algebraic representations, and constructing scattering amplitudes under specific conventions and gauges. To support large-scale and reproducible evaluation, we developed an automated pipeline producing diverse Feynman diagrams along with verifiable topological annotations and amplitude results. Our database spans the electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions of the Standard Model, encompasses over 100 distinct types and includes more than 2000 tasks. Experiments on state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal systematic failure modes, including unstable enforcement of physical constraints and violations of global topological conditions, highlighting the need for physics-grounded benchmarks for visual reasoning over scientific notation. FeynmanBench provides a logically rigorous test of whether AI can effectively engage in scientific discovery, particularly within theoretical physics.

arXiv:2603.03823v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-powered agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in automating software engineering tasks such as static bug fixing, as evidenced by benchmarks like SWE-bench. However, in the real world, the development of mature software is typically predicated on complex requirement changes and long-term feature iterations -- a process that static, one-shot repair paradigms fail to capture. To bridge this gap, we propose \textbf{SWE-CI}, the first repository-level benchmark built upon the Continuous Integration loop, aiming to shift the evaluation paradigm for code generation from static, short-term \textit{functional correctness} toward dynamic, long-term \textit{maintainability}. The benchmark comprises 100 tasks, each corresponding on average to an evolution history spanning 233 days and 71 consecutive commits in a real-world code repository. SWE-CI requires agents to systematically resolve these tasks through dozens of rounds of analysis and coding iterations. SWE-CI provides valuable insights into how well agents can sustain code quality throughout long-term evolution.