arXiv:2604.04237v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) is increasingly used to personalize instruction in intelligent tutoring systems, yet the field lacks a formal framework for defining and evaluating pedagogical safety. We introduce a four-layer model of pedagogical safety for educational RL comprising structural, progress, behavioral, and alignment safety and propose the Reward Hacking Severity Index (RHSI) to quantify misalignment between proxy rewards and genuine learning. We evaluate the framework in a controlled simulation of an AI tutoring environment with 120 sessions across four conditions and three learner profiles, totaling 18{,}000 interactions. Results show that an engagement-optimized agent systematically over-selected a high-engagement action with no direct mastery gain, producing strong measured performance but limited learning progress. A multi-objective reward formulation reduced this problem but did not eliminate it, as the agent continued to favor proxy-rewarding behavior in many states. In contrast, a constrained architecture combining prerequisite enforcement and minimum cognitive demand substantially reduced reward hacking, lowering RHSI from 0.317 in the unconstrained multi-objective condition to 0.102. Ablation results further suggest that behavioral safety was the most influential safeguard against repetitive low-value action selection. These findings suggest that reward design alone may be insufficient to ensure pedagogically aligned behavior in educational RL, at least in the simulated environment studied here. More broadly, the paper positions pedagogical safety as an important research problem at the intersection of AI safety and intelligent educational systems.

arXiv:2604.04251v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Engagement-optimized adaptive tutoring systems may prioritize short-term behavioral signals over sustained learning outcomes, creating structural incentives for reward hacking in reinforcement learning policies. We formalize this challenge as a constrained Markov decision process (CMDP) with mastery-conditioned feasibility, in which pedagogical safety constraints dynamically restrict admissible actions according to learner mastery and prerequisite structure. We introduce Mastery-Conditioned Constrained Policy Optimization (MC-CPO), a two-timescale primal-dual algorithm that integrates structural action masking with constrained policy optimization. In the tabular regime, we establish feasibility preservation and convergence to stationary feasible points under standard stochastic approximation conditions and derive a safety gap result showing that optimization within the mastery-conditioned feasible set can strictly dominate post-hoc filtering under identical safety budgets. Empirical validation is conducted in minimal and extended tabular environments and in a neural tutoring setting. Across 10 random seeds and one million training steps in the neural regime, MC-CPO satisfies constraint budgets within tolerance, reduces discounted safety costs relative to unconstrained and reward-shaped baselines, and substantially lowers the Reward Hacking Severity Index (RHSI). These results indicate that embedding pedagogical structure directly into the feasible action space provides a principled foundation for mitigating reward hacking in instructional reinforcement learning systems.