arXiv:2609.12579v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) scores student-generated prefixes with a solution-conditioned self-teacher, yet transfers supervision only through next-token probabilities. We ask whether the aligned final-layer discrepancy offers a useful second channel, and how to test that channel without confusing its geometry with auxiliary strength. SCOPE-OPSD projects the privileged teacher-student residual onto a frozen rank-64 factor estimated from residual covariance and language-model-head Fisher sensitivity. It reuses the forwards already required by OPSD and adds neither rollouts nor inference-time modules. A matched Random control preserves the structured factor's rank and nonzero spectrum and uses per-arm gradient-RMS calibration, isolating the effect of the data-dependent orientation. Across the complete 25/50/75/100-step trajectories for Qwen3-1.7B, 4B, and 8B, Structured is never below Pure OPSD, with strict gains in 11 of the 12 model-checkpoint combinations and an exact tie at 4B step 25. Structured also exceeds matched Random in 10 of the 12 combinations. At step 75 on Qwen3-1.7B, Structured exceeds matched Random by 1.39 Macro Avg@12 points in each of two independent training reruns. A cross-fitted diagnostic also shows 4.40 times greater held-out privileged-gap capture than the matched random orientation. The results support a compact, Fisher-conditioned privileged subspace for short-budget OPSD.

arXiv:2603.02234v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (SLTH) posits that large, randomly initialized neural networks contain sparse subnetworks capable of approximating a target function at initialization without training, suggesting that pruning alone is sufficient. Pruning methods are typically classified as unstructured, where individual weights can be removed from the network, and structured, where parameters are removed according to specific patterns, as in neuron pruning. Existing theoretical results supporting the SLTH rely almost exclusively on unstructured pruning, showing that logarithmic overparameterization suffices to approximate simple target networks. In contrast, neuron pruning has received limited theoretical attention. In this work, we consider the problem of approximating a single bias-free ReLU neuron using a randomly initialized bias-free two-layer ReLU network, thereby isolating the intrinsic limitations of neuron pruning. We show that neuron pruning requires a starting network with $\Omega(d/\varepsilon)$ hidden neurons to $\varepsilon$-approximate a target ReLU neuron. In contrast, weight pruning achieves $\varepsilon$-approximation with only $O(d\log(1/\varepsilon))$ neurons, establishing an exponential separation between the two pruning paradigms.

arXiv:2603.02234v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (SLTH) posits that large, randomly initialized neural networks contain sparse subnetworks capable of approximating a target function at initialization without training, suggesting that pruning alone is sufficient. Pruning methods are typically classified as unstructured, where individual weights can be removed from the network, and structured, where parameters are removed according to specific patterns, as in neuron pruning. Existing theoretical results supporting the SLTH rely almost exclusively on unstructured pruning, showing that logarithmic overparameterization suffices to approximate simple target networks. In contrast, neuron pruning has received limited theoretical attention. In this work, we consider the problem of approximating a single bias-free ReLU neuron using a randomly initialized bias-free two-layer ReLU network, thereby isolating the intrinsic limitations of neuron pruning. We show that neuron pruning requires a starting network with $\Omega(d/\varepsilon)$ hidden neurons to $\varepsilon$-approximate a target ReLU neuron. In contrast, weight pruning achieves $\varepsilon$-approximation with only $O(d\log(1/\varepsilon))$ neurons, establishing an exponential separation between the two pruning paradigms.