arXiv:2511.23342v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: MeanFlow offers a promising framework for one-step generative modeling by directly learning a mean-velocity field, bypassing expensive numerical integration. However, we find that the highly curved generative trajectories of existing models induce a noisy loss landscape, severely bottlenecking convergence and model quality. We leverage a fundamental geometric principle to overcome this: mean-velocity estimation is drastically simpler along straight paths. Building on this insight, we propose Rectified MeanFlow, a self-distillation approach that learns the mean-velocity field over a straightened velocity field, induced by rectified couplings from a pretrained model. To further promote linearity, we introduce a distance-based truncation heuristic that prunes residual high-curvature pairs. By smoothing the optimization landscape, our method achieves strong one-step generation performance. We improve the FID of baseline MeanFlow models from 30.9 to 8.6 under same training budget, and outperform the recent 2-rectified flow++ by 33.4% in FID while running 26x faster. Our work suggests that the difficulty of one-step flow generation stems partially from the rugged optimization landscapes induced by curved trajectories. Code is available at https://github.com/Xinxi-Zhang/Re-MeanFlow.

arXiv:2602.13611v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recently, large language models (LLMs) are extensively utilized to enhance development efficiency, leading to numerous benchmarks for evaluating their performance. However, these benchmarks predominantly focus on implementation, overlooking the equally critical aspect of software design. This gap raises two pivotal questions: (1) Can LLMs handle software design? (2) Can LLMs write code following the specific designs? To investigate these questions, this paper proposes DesBench, a design-aware benchmark for evaluating LLMs on three software design-related tasks: design-aware code generation, object-oriented modeling, and the design of acceptance test cases. DesBench comprises 30 manually crafted Java projects that include requirement documents, design models, implementations, and acceptance tests, amounting to a total of 30 design models, 194 Java classes, and 737 test cases. We evaluated seven state-of-the-art LLMs, including three DeepSeek R1, two Qwen2.5, and two GPT models, using DesBench. The results reveal that LLMs remain significantly challenged by the intricacies of software design: (1) For code generation, LLMs struggle to produce correct implementations when provided with only high-level or no designs. (2) In object-oriented modeling, while LLMs can accurately identify objects and classes, they face challenges in defining operations and inter-class relationships. (3) Acceptance test cases generated by LLMs from functional requirements achieve code coverage quality comparable to those written by humans. Our research highlights the current limitations of LLMs in managing software design and calls for further investigation into new design methodologies and languages suitable for LLM-based development.