arXiv:2603.08275v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs), respecting indigenous cultures becomes essential for models' culturally safety and responsible global applications. Existing studies separately consider cultural safety and cultural knowledge and neglect that the former should be grounded by the latter. This severely prevents LLMs from yielding culture-specific respectful responses. Consequently, adaptive cultural safety remains a formidable task. In this work, we propose to jointly model cultural safety and knowledge. First and foremost, cultural-safety and knowledge-paired data serve as the key prerequisite to conduct this research. However, the cultural diversity across regions and the subtlety of cultural differences pose significant challenges to the creation of such paired evaluation data. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework that integrates authoritative cultural knowledge descriptions curation, LLM-automated query generation, and heavy manual verification. Accordingly, we obtain a dataset named AdaCultureSafe containing 4.8K manually decomposed fine-grained cultural descriptions and the corresponding 48K manually verified safety- and knowledge-oriented queries. Upon the constructed dataset, we evaluate three families of popular LLMs on their cultural safety and knowledge proficiency, via which we make a critical discovery: no significant correlation exists between their cultural safety and knowledge proficiency. We then delve into the utility-related neuron activations within LLMs to investigate the potential cause of the absence of correlation, which can be attributed to the difference of the objectives of pre-training and post-alignment. We finally present a knowledge-grounded method, which significantly enhances cultural safety by enforcing the integration of knowledge into the LLM response generation process.

arXiv:2511.05854v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Hallucination in large language models (LLMs) remains a critical barrier to their safe deployment. For hallucination detection to be practical in real-world scenarios, the use of efficient small models is essential to ensure low latency and minimal resource consumption. However, existing methods rely on fixed verification strategies, where simply tuning small models to mimic fixed verification trajectories fails to capture the adaptability required for diverse hallucination patterns, thereby inducing planning instability. To address this limitation, we propose a ``Learning to Evaluate and Adaptively Plan'' (LEAP) framework, which shifts hallucination detection from fixed execution to dynamic strategy learning. Specifically, LEAP first employs a powerful teacher model to iteratively explore and refine verification strategies through a failure-driven loop. This dynamic planning capability is then distilled into an efficient student model, augmented by a novel proactive correction mechanism that enables the model to evaluate and optimize its verification strategy before execution. Experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate that LEAP outperforms state-of-the-art methods, offering an effective and scalable solution for reliable hallucination detection.