arXiv:2605.26029v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce CausaLab, a scalable environment for evaluating interactive causal discovery by LLM agents. Unlike prior evaluations, CausaLab evaluates both whether an agent can solve a problem using causal evidence and whether its answer is supported by a correct hypothesis about the underlying causal mechanism. Each episode places an agent in a synthetic laboratory: it receives prior measurement records, intervenes on a manipulator crystal, and predicts the resonance frequency of a held-out reactor crystal governed by the same mechanism. The hidden data-generating process is a randomly sampled structural causal model (SCM), so success requires recovering both a causal graph and structural equations rather than recalling prior knowledge. CausaLab also includes a domain-specific language that records the agent's evolving SCM hypothesis, making trajectories inspectable and comparable with ground truth. Experiments show a persistent gap between prediction and mechanism recovery: in the purely observational 6-node setting, GPT-5.2-high reaches 92% task accuracy but only 0.471 all-edge $F_1$. This observation further motivates our exploration of different interaction strategies: Mixed observation--intervention strategies improve structural fidelity: in the mixed 6-node setting, GPT-5.2-high achieves 80% on both task accuracy and all-edge $F_1$. Yet even strong agents struggle to design informative interventions, as pure intervention strategies perform poorly on both task accuracy and all-edge $F_1$. We identify premature stopping as a major weakness of agents, and show that asking the model to verify the consistency between its hypothesis and past data can help mitigate this issue. CausaLab therefore separates predictive success from causal understanding and exposes current LLM agents' limits as experimental causal reasoners.

arXiv:2510.25126v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Many real-world prediction tasks, particularly those involving entities such as customers or patients, involve both {sequential} and {relational} data. Each entity maintains its own sequence of events while simultaneously engaging in relationships with others. Existing methods in sequence and graph modeling often overlook one modality in favor of the other. We argue that these two facets should instead be integrated and learned jointly. We introduce BRIDGE, a unified end-to-end architecture that couples a sequence model with a graph module under a single objective, allowing gradients to flow across both components to learn task-aligned representations. To enable fine-grained interaction, we propose TOKENXATTN, a token-level cross-attention layer that facilitates message passing between specific events in neighboring sequences. Across two settings, relationship prediction and fraud detection, BRIDGE consistently outperforms static graph models, temporal graph methods, as well as sequence-only baselines on both ranking and classification metrics.