Background: Short-video platforms, characterized by algorithmic curation and passive consumption, have emerged as dominant components of digital life. However, the associations between short-video platform use and health across different groups and usage behaviors remain understudied. Objective: This study investigates associations between short-video platform use and health, examining whether these relationships vary across health status, usage behaviors, and socioeconomic status. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using multistage stratified sampling across eastern, central, and western China from July to September 2024. The inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, ability to communicate effectively, and no cognitive disorders or mental disturbance. Of 7725 participants enrolled, 46.96% (n=3628) were male, and the average age was 65.49 (SD 8.39) years. The data were collected via face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire. Self-rated health and relative health deprivation (Kakwani index) were used to measure health. Quantile regression explored associations between whether using short-video platform and health varies across the health distribution, while linear regression examined associations of years, frequency, daily duration, and purpose diversity of short-video platform use with health. Moderating effect analysis explored the role of socioeconomic status in the relationship between the daily duration of use and health. Results: Coefficients were tested using 2-tailed tests, and statistical significance was defined as a 2-sided value less than .05. Quantile regression revealed heterogeneous associations. Compared to nonusers, short-video platform users had better self-rated health at the 70th to 90th quantiles and lower relative health deprivation at the 10th to 30th quantiles. However, the users at the 10th quantile of self-rated health had worse self-rated health (=−2.224, 95% CI −3.835 to −0.613). Longer engagement (≥3 y) correlated with lower relative health deprivation (=1.970, 95% CI 0.308-3.632), while daily use of 1‐4 hours was associated with poorer self-rated health (=−3.385, 95% CI −4.872 to −1.898; =−3.038, 95% CI −5.054 to −1.022) and higher relative health deprivation (=0.035, 95% CI 0.021-0.050;

arXiv:2603.03314v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable and steadily improving performance across a wide range of tasks. However, LLM performance may be highly sensitive to prompt variations especially in scenarios with limited openness or strict output formatting requirements, indicating insufficient robustness. In real-world applications, user prompts provided to LLMs often contain imperfections, which may undermine the quality of the model's responses. To address this issue, previous work has primarily focused on preprocessing prompts, employing external tools or even LLMs to refine prompt formulations in advance. However, these approaches overlook the intrinsic robustness of LLMs, and their reliance on external components introduces additional computational overhead and uncertainty. In this work, we propose a Contrastive Learning-based Inverse Direct Preference Optimization (CoIPO) method that minimizes the discrepancy between the label-aligned logits produced by the model under a clean prompt and its noisy counterpart, and conduct a detailed analysis using mutual information theory. We augment the FLAN dataset by constructing paired prompts, each consisting of a clean prompt and its corresponding noisy version for training. Additionally, to evaluate the effectiveness, we develop NoisyPromptBench, a benchmark enhanced and derived from the existing PromptBench. Experimental results conducted on NoisyPromptBench demonstrate that our proposed method achieves a significant improvement in average accuracy over the current state-of-the-art approaches. The source code of CoIPO, pair-wise FLAN datasets, and NoisyPromptBench have already been released on https://github.com/vegetable-yx/CoIPO.

arXiv:2602.19320v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic memory systems enable large language model (LLM) agents to maintain state across long interactions, supporting long-horizon reasoning and personalization beyond fixed context windows. Despite rapid architectural development, the empirical foundations of these systems remain fragile: existing benchmarks are often underscaled, evaluation metrics are misaligned with semantic utility, performance varies significantly across backbone models, and system-level costs are frequently overlooked. This survey presents a structured analysis of agentic memory from both architectural and system perspectives. We first introduce a concise taxonomy of MAG systems based on four memory structures. Then, we analyze key pain points limiting current systems, including benchmark saturation effects, metric validity and judge sensitivity, backbone-dependent accuracy, and the latency and throughput overhead introduced by memory maintenance. By connecting the memory structure to empirical limitations, this survey clarifies why current agentic memory systems often underperform their theoretical promise and outlines directions for more reliable evaluation and scalable system design.