Eur J Cancer. 2026 Mar 24;239:116699. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116699. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The latest generation of liquid biopsies incorporates multi-omic features, including genomics, methylomics, and fragmentomics. Machine learning (ML) approaches have been proposed to synthesize these complex biological data for the development of diagnostic classifiers. This study aims to evaluate the integration of ML with circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis for early cancer detection.

METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched in July 2025. Eligible studies combined ML and cfDNA features to distinguish cancer patients (stages I-III) from non-cancer controls. Summary diagnostic performance metrics and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS: The study included 109 articles permitting analyses for lung (n = 34), liver (n = 29), colorectal (n = 28), pancreatic (n = 16), breast (n = 17), esophageal (n = 12), ovarian (n = 13), gastric (n = 9), head and neck (n = 4), and mixed (n = 27) cancer types. Specificity was consistently high across all tumor types and stages (94%-99%). Sensitivity ranged from 72% to 92% for stage I-III, 44-91% for stage I, 71-98% for stage II and 83-99% for stage III. In the pooled study population, neural networks (90%, 95% CI: 81%-95%), random forest (86%, 95% CI: 77%-92%) and heterogeneous ensemble learning (85%, 95% CI: 79%-89%) demonstrated the highest sensitivity. The stratified analysis by classifier feature revealed 86% (95% CI: 80%-90%) sensitivity for fragmentation and 81% (95% CI: 76%-85%) for methylation, with 92%-96% specificity.

CONCLUSION: ML and cfDNA profiling show potential for early cancer detection, with ensemble methods, neural networks and random forests achieving the best overall performance. Fragmentomic features provide the highest sensitivity.

PMID:41930854 | DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116699

Eur J Cancer. 2026 Mar 24;239:116699. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116699. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The latest generation of liquid biopsies incorporates multi-omic features, including genomics, methylomics, and fragmentomics. Machine learning (ML) approaches have been proposed to synthesize these complex biological data for the development of diagnostic classifiers. This study aims to evaluate the integration of ML with circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis for early cancer detection.

METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched in July 2025. Eligible studies combined ML and cfDNA features to distinguish cancer patients (stages I-III) from non-cancer controls. Summary diagnostic performance metrics and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS: The study included 109 articles permitting analyses for lung (n = 34), liver (n = 29), colorectal (n = 28), pancreatic (n = 16), breast (n = 17), esophageal (n = 12), ovarian (n = 13), gastric (n = 9), head and neck (n = 4), and mixed (n = 27) cancer types. Specificity was consistently high across all tumor types and stages (94%-99%). Sensitivity ranged from 72% to 92% for stage I-III, 44-91% for stage I, 71-98% for stage II and 83-99% for stage III. In the pooled study population, neural networks (90%, 95% CI: 81%-95%), random forest (86%, 95% CI: 77%-92%) and heterogeneous ensemble learning (85%, 95% CI: 79%-89%) demonstrated the highest sensitivity. The stratified analysis by classifier feature revealed 86% (95% CI: 80%-90%) sensitivity for fragmentation and 81% (95% CI: 76%-85%) for methylation, with 92%-96% specificity.

CONCLUSION: ML and cfDNA profiling show potential for early cancer detection, with ensemble methods, neural networks and random forests achieving the best overall performance. Fragmentomic features provide the highest sensitivity.

PMID:41930854 | DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116699

J Intern Med. 2026 Apr 3. doi: 10.1111/joim.70092. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health challenge, with multi-drug antibiotic regimens as the current standard of care. While effective at killing Mycobacterium tuberculosis, these treatments do not resolve persistent inflammation, prevent lung damage, or reverse immune dysregulation that contribute to poor outcomes and disease recurrence. Precision medicine offers a promising alternative but requires deeper insight into disease mechanisms to enable tailored interventions. This comprehensive review introduces the concept of immune endotyping to define the underlying disease mechanisms as tools to decode clinical and immunological heterogeneity in TB. TB displays a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes, from latent or asymptomatic infection to mild or severe disease with characteristic non-cavitary or cavitary lung pathology. Instead, distinct immune endotypes capture the diverse biological pathways that shape disease progression and treatment response. Similar clinical presentations may arise from different immune dysfunctions, underscoring the need to move beyond broad phenotypic classifications. Advances in multi-omics and computational analyses uncover immune signatures that enable stratification for host-directed therapies (HDTs) targeting hyperinflammation, immunosuppression, coagulopathy or metabolic exhaustion. Integrating clinical, radiological, and immunological data through multimodal profiling is essential for developing personalized interventions. We also explore how endotyping has transformed treatment in other diseases, offering valuable insights for TB. Additionally, we present examples of how putative immune endotypes may be targeted with appropriate HDTs. In summary, this review underscores the potential of immune endotypes to advance precision medicine in TB, moving beyond one-size-fits-all treatment to improve outcomes, especially in severe and drug-resistant cases.

PMID:41930636 | DOI:10.1111/joim.70092

Eur J Cancer. 2026 Mar 24;239:116699. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116699. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The latest generation of liquid biopsies incorporates multi-omic features, including genomics, methylomics, and fragmentomics. Machine learning (ML) approaches have been proposed to synthesize these complex biological data for the development of diagnostic classifiers. This study aims to evaluate the integration of ML with circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis for early cancer detection.

METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched in July 2025. Eligible studies combined ML and cfDNA features to distinguish cancer patients (stages I-III) from non-cancer controls. Summary diagnostic performance metrics and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS: The study included 109 articles permitting analyses for lung (n = 34), liver (n = 29), colorectal (n = 28), pancreatic (n = 16), breast (n = 17), esophageal (n = 12), ovarian (n = 13), gastric (n = 9), head and neck (n = 4), and mixed (n = 27) cancer types. Specificity was consistently high across all tumor types and stages (94%-99%). Sensitivity ranged from 72% to 92% for stage I-III, 44-91% for stage I, 71-98% for stage II and 83-99% for stage III. In the pooled study population, neural networks (90%, 95% CI: 81%-95%), random forest (86%, 95% CI: 77%-92%) and heterogeneous ensemble learning (85%, 95% CI: 79%-89%) demonstrated the highest sensitivity. The stratified analysis by classifier feature revealed 86% (95% CI: 80%-90%) sensitivity for fragmentation and 81% (95% CI: 76%-85%) for methylation, with 92%-96% specificity.

CONCLUSION: ML and cfDNA profiling show potential for early cancer detection, with ensemble methods, neural networks and random forests achieving the best overall performance. Fragmentomic features provide the highest sensitivity.

PMID:41930854 | DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116699

Eur J Cancer. 2026 Mar 24;239:116699. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116699. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The latest generation of liquid biopsies incorporates multi-omic features, including genomics, methylomics, and fragmentomics. Machine learning (ML) approaches have been proposed to synthesize these complex biological data for the development of diagnostic classifiers. This study aims to evaluate the integration of ML with circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis for early cancer detection.

METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched in July 2025. Eligible studies combined ML and cfDNA features to distinguish cancer patients (stages I-III) from non-cancer controls. Summary diagnostic performance metrics and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS: The study included 109 articles permitting analyses for lung (n = 34), liver (n = 29), colorectal (n = 28), pancreatic (n = 16), breast (n = 17), esophageal (n = 12), ovarian (n = 13), gastric (n = 9), head and neck (n = 4), and mixed (n = 27) cancer types. Specificity was consistently high across all tumor types and stages (94%-99%). Sensitivity ranged from 72% to 92% for stage I-III, 44-91% for stage I, 71-98% for stage II and 83-99% for stage III. In the pooled study population, neural networks (90%, 95% CI: 81%-95%), random forest (86%, 95% CI: 77%-92%) and heterogeneous ensemble learning (85%, 95% CI: 79%-89%) demonstrated the highest sensitivity. The stratified analysis by classifier feature revealed 86% (95% CI: 80%-90%) sensitivity for fragmentation and 81% (95% CI: 76%-85%) for methylation, with 92%-96% specificity.

CONCLUSION: ML and cfDNA profiling show potential for early cancer detection, with ensemble methods, neural networks and random forests achieving the best overall performance. Fragmentomic features provide the highest sensitivity.

PMID:41930854 | DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2026.116699

J Intern Med. 2026 Apr 3. doi: 10.1111/joim.70092. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health challenge, with multi-drug antibiotic regimens as the current standard of care. While effective at killing Mycobacterium tuberculosis, these treatments do not resolve persistent inflammation, prevent lung damage, or reverse immune dysregulation that contribute to poor outcomes and disease recurrence. Precision medicine offers a promising alternative but requires deeper insight into disease mechanisms to enable tailored interventions. This comprehensive review introduces the concept of immune endotyping to define the underlying disease mechanisms as tools to decode clinical and immunological heterogeneity in TB. TB displays a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes, from latent or asymptomatic infection to mild or severe disease with characteristic non-cavitary or cavitary lung pathology. Instead, distinct immune endotypes capture the diverse biological pathways that shape disease progression and treatment response. Similar clinical presentations may arise from different immune dysfunctions, underscoring the need to move beyond broad phenotypic classifications. Advances in multi-omics and computational analyses uncover immune signatures that enable stratification for host-directed therapies (HDTs) targeting hyperinflammation, immunosuppression, coagulopathy or metabolic exhaustion. Integrating clinical, radiological, and immunological data through multimodal profiling is essential for developing personalized interventions. We also explore how endotyping has transformed treatment in other diseases, offering valuable insights for TB. Additionally, we present examples of how putative immune endotypes may be targeted with appropriate HDTs. In summary, this review underscores the potential of immune endotypes to advance precision medicine in TB, moving beyond one-size-fits-all treatment to improve outcomes, especially in severe and drug-resistant cases.

PMID:41930636 | DOI:10.1111/joim.70092