arXiv:2604.04917v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: What does it take to build a visual reasoner that works across charts, science, spatial understanding, and open-ended tasks? The strongest vision-language models (VLMs) show such broad visual reasoning is within reach, but the recipe behind them remains unclear, locked behind proprietary reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines with non-public data. We introduce Vero, a family of fully open VLMs that matches or exceeds existing open-weight models across diverse visual reasoning tasks. We scale RL data and rewards across six broad task categories, constructing Vero-600K, a 600K-sample dataset from 59 datasets, and designing task-routed rewards that handle heterogeneous answer formats. Vero achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving over four base models by 3.6-5.3 points on average across VeroEval, our suite of 30 challenging benchmarks. Starting from Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, Vero outperforms Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking on 23 of 30 benchmarks without additional proprietary thinking data. When trained from the same base model, Vero-600K exceeds existing RL datasets across task categories. Systematic ablations reveal that different task categories elicit qualitatively distinct reasoning patterns that transfer poorly in isolation, suggesting that broad data coverage is the primary driver of strong RL scaling. All data, code, and models are released.

arXiv:2509.18527v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimedia decision support requires more than recognition; it requires explicit state estimates that can be checked against rules, audited by humans, and consumed by downstream decision logic. We present the FEncing Referee Assistant (FERA), a pose-based framework for this setting, and study it through foil fencing, where decisions depend on fast bilateral motion and right-of-way rules. The framework separates canonical participant tracking, kinematic tokenization, calibrated temporal perception, a compact structured decision layer, and an explanation-oriented retrieval interface. We also release an audited benchmark with adjudicated labels and fixed folds for reproducible evaluation. Under a shared protocol, a lightweight lifted-depth sidecar strengthens the best graph-based perception model, while a compact structured classifier on the fixed two-dimensional token stream reaches 0.624 accuracy and a 0.632 macro-averaged F1 score on the final Left / Right / None decision. The case study supports a broader design lesson: keep the boundary between perception and rule application explicit, preserve uncertainty, and choose the perception front end according to the downstream operating point.

arXiv:2602.13576v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evaluation and alignment pipelines for large language models increasingly rely on LLM-based judges, whose behavior is guided by natural-language rubrics and validated on benchmarks. We identify a previously under-recognized vulnerability in this workflow, which we term Rubric-Induced Preference Drift (RIPD). Even when rubric edits pass benchmark validation, they can still produce systematic and directional shifts in a judge's preferences on target domains. Because rubrics serve as a high-level decision interface, such drift can emerge from seemingly natural, criterion-preserving edits and remain difficult to detect through aggregate benchmark metrics or limited spot-checking. We further show this vulnerability can be exploited through rubric-based preference attacks, in which benchmark-compliant rubric edits steer judgments away from a fixed human or trusted reference on target domains, systematically inducing RIPD and reducing target-domain accuracy up to 9.5% (helpfulness) and 27.9% (harmlessness). When these judgments are used to generate preference labels for downstream post-training, the induced bias propagates through alignment pipelines and becomes internalized in trained policies. This leads to persistent and systematic drift in model behavior. Overall, our findings highlight evaluation rubrics as a sensitive and manipulable control interface, revealing a system-level alignment risk that extends beyond evaluator reliability alone. The code is available at: https://github.com/ZDCSlab/Rubrics-as-an-Attack-Surface. Warning: Certain sections may contain potentially harmful content that may not be appropriate for all readers.