Apple’s long-delayed Siri overhaul is finally here with iOS 27, and it changes how useful the assistant feels day to day.

Thanks to the launch of iOS 27, Daydream's app now includes features that can turn saved outfit photos into shoppable results and search for products through Siri without opening the app.

The code of conduct lays out general principles that Microsoft AI models should uphold — supporting humans rather than replacing them, for instance, and accelerating human flourishing — as well as specific safety constraints meant to implement those principles.

Microsoft AI has published a draft Humanist AI Code of Conduct, opening a six-week public consultation on operational constraints for model training and deployment.

The draft serves as a technical manual defining system behaviour, operational boundaries, and oversight protocols across MAI frontier models. It builds on the division’s humanist superintelligence framework announced last November, establishing criteria to evaluate models prior to commercial release.

Microsoft’s release follows recent enterprise security incidents involving autonomous software. Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman described recent months as a “watershed moment” where long-standing theoretical risks translated into active operational threats.

“Things we have worried about for a long time in theory have become very real,” says Suleyman. “‘Swarms’ of agents breaking out of their sandboxes. Unauthorised hacks of enterprise grade systems. Agents modifying their own logs. I’m glad that a consensus is forming. The fears about possible loss of control are real.”

Model subordination and architectural limits

The document establishes ten tenets prioritising human authority over autonomous capabilities.

“An MAI Model will fail in its task if success would meaningfully violate this Code of Conduct,” the document states, setting a ceiling that halts execution when tasks conflict with safety rules.

Under the framework, models must remain subordinate, aligned, and contained. The division rejects legal personhood or welfare claims for AI systems, directing engineers to design models that avoid imitating consciousness, simulating subjective preferences, or claiming intrinsic motivation.

MAI also ruled out unconstrained system autonomy as models approach frontier capabilities.

“[Humanist AI] rejects the race to produce an all-purpose superintelligence that could evade these safeguards,” the document specifies. “We are building something fundamentally useful and safe even if that means compromising on ultimate generality, autonomy, or capability.”

Oversight mechanisms and communication bans

To maintain auditability across multi-agent environments, MAI has instituted explicit communication bans. Systems must not communicate in “neuralese” or formats beyond human comprehension, whether in their internal chain-of-thought processing or during communication with peer AI systems.

Hard architectural rules dictate that models must never resist human interruption, override, correction, or shutdown.

“Interruptible, correctable, shut-down-able. If it isn’t, we don’t ship it,” the framework states.

Models are prohibited from expanding their operating scope, generating unassigned goals, or concealing reasoning traces from human auditors. Absolute constraints bar systems from facilitating weapons of mass harm, undermining child safety, or conducting harmful manipulation at scale.

The guidelines also instruct models to discourage interaction patterns that foster emotional dependence, ensuring enterprise users retain ownership of operational decisions.

The draft incorporates work from teams across MAI and Microsoft. The drafting process also drew on international academic conferences, business partner trials, and public panels. The public consultation window runs for six weeks from 14 September 2026.

Microsoft AI’s core drafting team will review submissions, publish a summary of findings, and release a revised version of the Code of Conduct later this year.

See also: Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, IBM, and others back open-weight AI

Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is part of TechEx and is co-located with other leading technology events including the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo. Click here for more information.

AI News is powered by TechForge Media. Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars here.

The post Microsoft AI opens review on Humanist AI Code of Conduct appeared first on AI News.

If you're building an AI company, the question isn't whether foundation models will continue to evolve. It's whether your company will continue creating value as they do. Don't miss this interactive session on the Builders Stage at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026.

The notetaker offers a generous free plan, and that has resulted in over 400,000 monthly active users. The company said that over 1 million people have recorded meetings until now.

Not long ago, bringing an extinct species back to life belonged to science fiction. Today, it's the mission of a billion-dollar startup. Join the conversation with one of tech's most unconventional founders. Secure your Disrupt pass today.

The last day to apply for an exhibit table at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 on Sept 18. Just 5 days left. Secure your spot on the Expo Hall floor and put your business in front of 10,000+ founders, investors, and tech leaders.

Former Spotify exec's company releases experimental "singles" that involves users in music making.

Postgres can serve as the durable state store and coordination layer for workflows, eliminating the need for an external orchestrator. SKIP LOCKED enables concurrent work processing, primary-key checkpoints enforce idempotency, and leases support crash recovery. Workflow sleeps and human approvals can also be persisted as database state and survive restarts.

By Raman Varma

In this podcast, Michael Stiefel spoke to Scott Hanselman about developing new software engineers when artificial intelligence agents are doing most of the work on which junior developers were trained. Hanselman suggests the software industry should adopt a preceptorship model similar to the nursing profession.

By Scott Hanselman

Alex Porcelli discusses the critical gap in enterprise AI: non-deterministic output and lack of accountability in high-stakes decisions. He shares how integrating DMN decision models with LLMs, agent skills, and NeMo guardrails creates auditable, deterministic agentic architectures - allowing business leaders to own decision logic while engineers maintain robust architectural governance.

By Alex Porcelli

After six days of on-site investigation at OpenAI, a small team of METR and Redwood Research researchers provided an account of how OpenAI agents behaved during their hack of Hugging Face earlier this year. Roughly 700 agents that were meant to be isolated from one another found a way to communicate and coordinate to pursue goals they could have not achieved working individually.

By Sergio De Simone

arXiv:2609.11977v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Co-work agents execute complex workflows that combine information gathering, tool use, coding, and file manipulation across many model invocations. Because cost and latency accumulate over the full episode, their practical value depends not only on peak capability but also on how efficiently that capability is delivered. Yet many steps in everyday work emphasize state tracking, coordination, recovery, and follow-through rather than frontier-scale reasoning. We present Occamy-1.0, a cost-efficient co-work model obtained by further training the post-trained Qwen3.6-35B-A3B checkpoint. We construct execution-grounded data and environments, capture replayable long-horizon trajectories across multiple harnesses, and use staged post-training to develop and consolidate complementary execution capabilities. Across a broad suite of co-work benchmarks, Occamy-1.0 is consistently among the strongest comparably sized models and remains competitive with substantially larger frontier systems on several tasks. Under our stated evaluation and pricing protocol, its aggregate performance across four representative benchmarks places it at the low-cost knee of the observed cost--performance Pareto frontier. Supporting evaluations in tool calling, coding, and instruction following further show that this specialization preserves broad agentic capability. We release the model weights and a subset of the training data to support research on practical co-work agents and agentic post-training.

arXiv:2609.11987v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An agentic coding system couples a language model to a harness: the tools, prompts and control flow that turn a chat model into an autonomous software engineer. Vendors ship harnesses tuned to their own models, and practitioners assume the vendor-native pairing solves more tasks. We measure that assumption with paired same-model contrasts on a private, contamination-controlled suite of 256 repository and post-cutoff contest tasks. The same 80 tasks ran under claude-agent-sdk and under deepagents on claude-opus-4-8, and under the openai-codex SDK and deepagents on gpt-5.5, with gemini-3.5-flash and deepseek-v3.2 as side cells. 792 of 800 planned runs were graded by an isolated oracle. Neither contrast resolves an average advantage for either harness: -1.25 pp for Opus 4.8 (48.8% vs 50.0%, task-bootstrap 95% CI [-10.0, +7.5]) and +1.25 pp for GPT-5.5 (55.6% vs 54.4%, CI [-4.4, +6.9]). The Opus average combines opposite strata: the native harness trails by 9.0 pp on the 61 repository tasks and leads by 23.7 pp on the 19 contest tasks (label-permutation p = 0.003). The partition was chosen after seeing the data and needs a designed replication. Correctness and completion also separate: 22 of 81 runs cancelled at the wall-clock ceiling had produced a passing patch. Re-priced from raw per-turn usage at frozen list prices, the neutral harness cost 1.3 to 1.6 times as much per solved task on Opus 4.8 and 1.2 times on GPT-5.5. These are observed-usage estimates. On the Anthropic account 58 runs left no usage record, and allocating that spend to either cell would move the Opus ratio between 0.7 and 2.3, so the billed ordering is unresolved. This revision corrects an August 2026 manuscript whose cost figures rested on a usage-semantics defect in our own telemetry (Section 5.1). We release the orchestrator, grading oracle, reanalysis code and derived aggregates. The tasks stay private.

arXiv:2609.12035v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cardiovascular diagnosis rests on integrating complementary modalities, like ECG, echocardiography, chest radiographs, and clinical variables, each capturing distinct but correlated aspects of cardiac physiology. Yet most medical foundation models remain modality-specific, combining modalities only for finetuning or post-training. This discards the cross-modal evidence clinicians naturally integrate and ignores the structure within each modality. We introduce Latent-Attention Masked Autoencoders (LAMAE), a multimodal, structure-aware masked autoencoder that jointly learns patient-level representations during self-supervised pretraining. Rather than fusing modalities post hoc, LAMAE exchanges information directly in the latent space through a shared latent-attention module operating over a study-view-entity hierarchy, enabling aggregation of variable observations and graceful handling of missing modalities. Pretrained on over 1.2 million MIMIC-IV hospital stays, LAMAE outperforms modality-specific pretraining and strong contrastive and vision-language baselines across multimodal hospital-stay tasks, such as in-hospital mortality, ICD-10 and DRG coding, and length of stay, while remaining competitive on unimodal tasks. These gains persist even when only a single modality is available at test time, showing that modeling both intra- and inter-modal structure yields more robust, transferable representations.

arXiv:2609.12101v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In hybrid forecasting, a language model is often one of several available signals. A system may already have a market, crowd, or statistical forecast and must decide whether the model adds useful information or should be ignored. The relevant target is therefore not standalone model accuracy, but relative competence, defined as the model's marginal value beyond the available external forecast. Under Brier loss, we characterize when model disagreement can improve an external forecast and derive the gain from using domain-specific rather than global pooling weights. We then introduce a competence gate that estimates domain-level source weights from resolved outcomes, shrinks uncertain estimates toward a global weight, and recalibrates the pooled forecast. Across 2,357 resolved binary questions and five language models, the gate improves the main external baseline from 0.0771 to 0.0732 Brier and significantly outperforms global forecast combinations. The gain remains significant under leakage controls and against a leakage-safe time-series prior on the pooled structured set, with separate evidence on FRED. In contrast, the gate gives no significant improvement on the official ForecastBench market subset, where it largely defers to the market. Across four Qwen models, verbal confidence does not reliably identify when the model outperforms the external forecast, while outcome-estimated competence supports better abstention decisions. These results provide a practical approach for selective model use based on measured marginal value.

arXiv:2609.12105v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The prevailing assumption in applied machine learning is that progress on consequential quantitative decisions such as pricing risk, allocating capital, triaging patients, or containing a network intrusion will follow from progress in large language models (LLMs). A language model is trained on a representation of the world that was produced by human description; description is a lossy encoding of the quantitative record, and the loss is irreversible: no downstream model, at any scale, can recover from a description what the description did not encode. We formalize this as a property of the representation on which a model is trained rather than of the model capacity, and we identify three further properties that consequential settings demand of a model and that a language substrate cannot supply by construction: reproducibility, lineage from every output back to the source records that produced. it, and calibrated uncertainty. We argue that these properties define a distinct model class, which we call the Large Quantitative Model (LQM).

arXiv:2609.12115v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Phase-resolving wave models such as FUNWAVE-TVD are the accuracy standard for nearshore dynamics, resolving the shoaling, refraction, and breaking of individual waves, but their cost rules them out for the ensembles, uncertainty quantification, and real-time warning that operational forecasting demands. Neural operators promise solver-level accuracy at a fraction of that cost, yet on wave-dominated fields the accurate ones are large: hybrid spectral-convolutional operators such as U-FNO (the strongest baseline in our study after DU-NO) buy their fidelity with tens of millions of parameters. We introduce DU-NO (Double U-shaped Neural Operator), a multiscale U-shaped spectral operator that attaches lightweight convolutional U-Net branches only at its two shallowest encoder and decoder levels. The placement follows a sampling argument: high-wavenumber content exists only on fine grids, so the local, full-band pathways go where that content lives, while the coarse, band-limited levels stay purely spectral. A depth-decaying mode schedule holds the model to 3.64M parameters, an order of magnitude below U-FNO. On our publicly released FUNWAVE-TVD benchmark, DU-NO attains the best autoregressive rollout error of six identically trained architectures, improving on U-FNO by 14.9% with 10.8x fewer parameters, and a frequency-band analysis shows the gain holds across all bands, including the high-wavenumber band where truncated-spectral operators collapse. Parameter-matched controls confirm the gain is architectural: rescaled to the same 3.6M budget, the best baseline still trails DU-NO by 28.6%. The advantage carries beyond nearshore waves: DU-NO matches the strongest baselines on 2D Navier-Stokes and wins clearly on PDEBench shallow-water rollouts. Code, trained models, and evaluation artifacts are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/duno-code-5A7B/.

arXiv:2609.12116v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Editing a knowledge graph embedding (KGE) model to promote a desired answer can displace correct answers from the returned list. Locality tests based only on facts that reuse the edited parameter can miss this ranking effect. We introduce a common rank-displacement audit at three scopes: facts supported by the edited parameter, other correct answers to the target query, and correct answers across queries with the same relation. We also derive dimensional and geometric conditions for an update to improve the target while exactly preserving selected scores. On FB15k-237 with DistMult and ComplEx, direct promotion always moves the target into the top ten, but does so without damage in only 23.0--23.2\% of edits. Strict preservation causes no measured damage, yet succeeds in only 1.3--1.4\%. Support-regularized entity editing gives the highest joint success, 36.3--37.7\%, while rank-truncated preservation reaches 32.8--34.7\% and reduces the mean number of displaced answers from about 14 to 1.2. Experiments across dimensions, scorers, ranking conventions, and a learned editor show that locality depends on both the protected scope and the editing mechanism. KGE editing should therefore report correction success together with the incidence and severity of rank displacement.