arXiv:2603.04002v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reasoning segmentation increasingly employs reinforcement learning to generate explanatory reasoning chains that guide Multimodal Large Language Models. While these geometric rewards are primarily confined to guiding the final localization, they are incapable of discriminating whether the reasoning process remains anchored on the referred region or strays into irrelevant context. Lacking this discriminative guidance, the model's reasoning often devolves into unfocused and verbose chains that ultimately fail to disambiguate and perceive the target in complex scenes. This suggests a need to complement the RL objective with Discriminative Perception, an ability to actively distinguish a target from its context. To realize this, we propose DPAD to compel the model to generate a descriptive caption of the referred object, which is then used to explicitly discriminate by contrasting the caption's semantic relevance to the referred object against the wider context. By optimizing for this discriminative capability, the model is forced to focus on the unique attributes of the target, leading to a more converged and efficient reasoning chain. The descriptive caption also serves as an interpretability rationale that aligns with the segmentation. Experiments on the benchmarks confirm the validity of our approach, delivering substantial performance gains, with the cIoU on ReasonSeg increasing by 3.09% and the reasoning chain length decreasing by approximately 42%. Code is available at https://github.com/mrazhou/DPAD

arXiv:2509.21782v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed as the core reasoning engine for web-facing systems, powering GUI agents and front-end automation that must interpret page structure, select actionable widgets, and execute multi-step interactions reliably. However, existing benchmarks largely emphasize visual perception or UI code generation, showing insufficient evaluation on the reasoning, robustness and safety capability required for end-to-end web applications. To bridge the gap, we introduce a comprehensive web understanding benchmark, named WebRRSBench, that jointly evaluates Reasoning, Robustness, and Safety across eight tasks, such as position relationship reasoning, color robustness, and safety critical detection, etc. The benchmark is constructed from 729 websites and contains 3799 QA pairs that probe multi-step inference over page structure, text, widgets, and safety-critical interactions. To ensure reliable measurement, we adopt standardized prompts, a protocolized and deterministic evaluation pipeline, and multi-stage quality control combining automatic checks with targeted human verification. We evaluate 11 MLLMs on WebRRSBench. The results reveal significant gaps: models still struggle with compositional and cross-element reasoning over realistic layouts, show limited robustness when facing perturbations in user interfaces and content such as layout rearrangements or visual style shifts, and are rather conservative in recognizing and avoiding safety critical or irreversible actions. Our code and appendix are available at https: //github.com/annoy-worker/WebRSSBench.