arXiv:2603.06729v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Navigating safely through dense crowds requires collision avoidance that generalizes beyond the densities seen during training. Learning-based crowd navigation can break under out-of-distribution crowd sizes due to density-sensitive observation normalization and social-cost scaling, while analytical solvers often remain safe but freeze in tight interactions. We propose a reinforcement learning approach for dense, variable-density navigation that attains zero-shot density generalization using a density-invariant observation encoding with density-randomized training and physics-informed proxemic reward shaping with density-adaptive scaling. The encoding represents the distance-sorted $K$ nearest pedestrians plus bounded crowd summaries, keeping input statistics stable as crowd size grows. Trained with $N\!\in\![11,16]$ pedestrians in a $3\mathrm{m}\times3\mathrm{m}$ arena and evaluated up to $N\!=\!21$ pedestrians ($1.3\times$ denser), our policy reaches the goal in $>99\%$ of episodes and achieves $86\%$ collision-free success in random crowds, with markedly less freezing than analytical methods and a $>\!60$-point collision-free margin over learning-based benchmark methods. Codes are available at \href{https://github.com/jznmsl/PSS-Social}{https://github.com/jznmsl/PSS-Social}.

arXiv:2603.07474v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: What is the interplay between semantic representations learned by language models (LM) from surface form alone to those learned from more grounded evidence? We study this question for a scenario where part of the input comes from a different modality -- in our case, in a vision-language model (VLM), where a pretrained LM is aligned with a pretrained image encoder. As a case study, we focus on the task of predicting hypernyms of objects represented in images. We do so in a VLM setup where the image encoder and LM are kept frozen, and only the intermediate mappings are learned. We progressively deprive the VLM of explicit evidence for hypernyms, and test whether knowledge of hypernyms is recoverable from the LM. We find that the LMs we study can recover this knowledge and generalize even in the most extreme version of this experiment (when the model receives no evidence of a hypernym during training). Additional experiments suggest that this cross-modal taxonomic generalization persists under counterfactual image-label mappings only when the counterfactual data have high visual similarity within each category. Taken together, these findings suggest that cross-modal generalization in LMs arises as a result of both coherence in the extralinguistic input and knowledge derived from language cues.