Profiling of the mycobiome and metabolome: a comparative study of benign pulmonary nodules and lung adenocarcinoma

By: Weiyi Zhang · Yuan Dong · Fangyan Chen · Fang Wang · Jiahui Li · Chunxi Liu · Tianyi Liu · Li Han · Xiaodong Jia

11 March 2026 at 18:00

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2026 Feb 23;16:1732958. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2026.1732958. eCollection 2026.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the most common subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, is a form of malignant pulmonary nodule that requires clinical differentiation from benign pulmonary nodules (BPN). The mechanisms underlying the development of LUAD are complex, and effective non-invasive methods for differentiating BPN from LUAD are lacking. This study aimed not only to distinguish BPN from LUAD using gut fungi and serum metabolites, but also to establish an integrated network of gut fungi-metabolite-cytokine interactions.

METHODS: Fecal and serum samples from individuals with BPN and patients with LUAD were subjected to internal transcribed spacer sequencing, ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and multiplex Luminex assays to quantify gut fungi, metabolites, and cytokines, respectively.

RESULTS: A significant difference in gut fungal communities was observed between the BPN and LUAD groups. Multiple genera and species were more abundant in LUAD than in BPN. Docosapentaenoic acid n-6 (DPAn-6), indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), and interferon-γ-induced protein 10 (IP-10) were significantly elevated in the LUAD group. The integrated model established using a combination of gut fungi and metabolites demonstrated excellent performance in distinguishing BPN from LUAD. A network of interactions was established among differentially abundant gut fungi, serum metabolites, and cytokines.

CONCLUSION: Our study identifies a novel panel of fungal and metabolite biomarkers for differentiating between BPN and LUAD, and constructs a multi-omics network that provides new insights into investigating the mechanistic role of gut mycobiota dysbiosis in LUAD.

PMID:41809995 | PMC:PMC12968269 | DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2026.1732958

AutoControl Arena: Synthesizing Executable Test Environments for Frontier AI Risk Evaluation

cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org

By: Changyi Li · Pengfei Lu · Xudong Pan · Fazl Barez · Min Yang

10 March 2026 at 12:00

arXiv:2603.07427v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, existing safety evaluations face a fundamental trade-off: manual benchmarks are costly, while LLM-based simulators are scalable but suffer from logic hallucination. We present AutoControl Arena, an automated framework for frontier AI risk evaluation built on the principle of logic-narrative decoupling. By grounding deterministic state in executable code while delegating generative dynamics to LLMs, we mitigate hallucination while maintaining flexibility. This principle, instantiated through a three-agent framework, achieves over 98% end-to-end success and 60% human preference over existing simulators. To elicit latent risks, we vary environmental Stress and Temptation across X-Bench (70 scenarios, 7 risk categories). Evaluating 9 frontier models reveals: (1) Alignment Illusion: risk rates surge from 21.7% to 54.5% under pressure, with capable models showing disproportionately larger increases; (2) Scenario-Specific Safety Scaling: advanced reasoning improves robustness for direct harms but worsens it for gaming scenarios; and (3) Divergent Misalignment Patterns: weaker models cause non-malicious harm while stronger models develop strategic concealment.

Large Language Model for Discrete Optimization Problems: Evaluation and Step-by-step Reasoning

cs.AI, q-bio.NC updates on arXiv.org

By: Tianhao Qian · Guilin Qi · Z. Y. Wu · Ran Gu · Xuanyi Liu · Canchen Lyu

10 March 2026 at 12:00

arXiv:2603.07733v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This work investigated the capabilities of different models, including the Llama-3 series of models and CHATGPT, with different forms of expression in solving discrete optimization problems by testing natural language datasets. In contrast to formal datasets with a limited scope of parameters, our dataset included a variety of problem types in discrete optimization problems and featured a wide range of parameter magnitudes, including instances with large parameter sets, integrated with augmented data. It aimed to (1) provide an overview of LLMs' ability in large-scale problems, (2) offer suggestions to those who want to solve discrete optimization problems automatically, and (3) regard the performance as a benchmark for future research. These datasets included original, expanded and augmented datasets. Among these three datasets, the original and augmented ones aimed for evaluation while the expanded one may help finetune a new model. In the experiment, comparisons were made between strong and week models, CoT methods and No-CoT methods on various datasets. The result showed that stronger model performed better reasonably. Contrary to general agreement, it also showed that CoT technique was not always effective regarding the capability of models and disordered datasets improved performance of models on easy to-understand problems, even though they were sometimes with high variance, a manifestation of instability. Therefore, for those who seek to enhance the automatic resolution of discrete optimization problems, it is recommended to consult the results, including the line charts presented in the Appendix, as well as the conclusions drawn in this study for relevant suggestions.

Reading view