❌

Reading view

FA-INR: Adaptive Implicit Neural Representations for Interpretable Exploration of Simulation Ensembles

arXiv:2506.06858v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Surrogate models are essential for efficient exploration of large-scale ensemble simulations. Implicit neural representations (INRs) provide a compact and continuous framework for modeling spatially structured data, but they often struggle with learning complex localized structures within the scientific fields. Recent INR-based surrogates address this by augmenting INRs with explicit feature structures, but at the cost of flexibility and substantial memory overhead. In this paper, we present Feature-Adaptive INR (FA-INR), an adaptive INR-based surrogate model for high-fidelity and interpretable exploration of ensemble simulations. Instead of relying on structured feature representations, FA-INR leverages cross-attention over a learnable key-value memory bank to allocate model capacity adaptively based on the data characteristics. To further improve scalability, we introduce a coordinate-guided mixture of experts (MoE) framework that enhances both efficiency and specialization of feature representations. More importantly, the learned experts produce an interpretable partition over the simulation domain, enabling scientists to identify complex structures and perform localized parameter-space exploration. Beyond quantitative and qualitative evaluations, we also demonstrate that our learned expert specialization can reveal meaningful scientific insights and support localized sensitivity analysis.
  •  

AVA-Bench: Atomic Visual Ability Benchmark for Vision Foundation Models

arXiv:2506.09082v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rise of vision foundation models (VFMs) calls for systematic evaluation. A common approach pairs VFMs with large language models (LLMs) as general-purpose heads, followed by evaluation on broad Visual Question Answering (VQA) benchmarks. However, this protocol has two key blind spots: (i) the instruction tuning data may not align with VQA test distributions, meaning a wrong prediction can stem from such data mismatch rather than a VFM' visual shortcomings; (ii) VQA benchmarks often require multiple visual abilities, making it hard to tell whether errors stem from lacking all required abilities or just a single critical one. To address these gaps, we introduce AVA-Bench, the first benchmark that explicitly disentangles 14 Atomic Visual Abilities (AVAs) -- foundational skills like localization, depth estimation, and spatial understanding that collectively support complex visual reasoning tasks. By decoupling AVAs and matching training and test distributions within each, AVA-Bench pinpoints exactly where a VFM excels or falters. Applying AVA-Bench to leading VFMs thus reveals distinctive "ability fingerprints," turning VFM selection from educated guesswork into principled engineering. Notably, we find that a 0.5B LLM yields similar VFM rankings as a 7B LLM while cutting GPU hours by 8x, enabling more efficient evaluation. By offering a comprehensive and transparent benchmark, we hope AVA-Bench lays the foundation for the next generation of VFMs.
  •  
❌