Semin Cancer Biol. 2024 Dec 27;109:25-43. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2024.12.005. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most lethal and common form of pancreatic cancer, it has no specific symptoms, and most of the patients are diagnosed when the disease is already at an advanced stage. Chemotherapy typically has only a modest effect, making surgery the most effective treatment option. However, only a small percentage of patients are amenable to surgery. One viable strategy to reduce PDAC death burden associated with the disease is to focus on precursor lesions and identify markers able to predict who will evolve into PDAC. While most PDACs are believed to be preceded by pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms (PanINs), 5-10 % arise from Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), which are mass-forming cystic lesions that are very common in the general population. IPMNs offer an invaluable model of pancreatic carcinogenesis for researchers to analyse, as well as a target population for PDAC early detection by clinicians. The evolution of IPMN into cancer is a complex and multistep process, therefore the identification of individual markers will not be the solution. In recent years, multiple omics technologies have been instrumental to identify possible biomarkers of IPMN progression and carcinogenesis. The only foreseeable strategy will be to integrate multi-omics data, alongside clinical and morphological features, into a progression score or signature using either standard epidemiologic tools or artificial intelligence. The aim of this manuscript is to review the current knowledge on genetic biomarkers and to briefly mention also additional omics, such as metabolomics, the exposome, the miRNome and epigenomics of IPMNs.

PMID:39733817 | DOI:10.1016/j.semcancer.2024.12.005

J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 12. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02197-6. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a formidable health challenge due to its detection at a late stage and a lack of reliable biomarkers for early detection. Although levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 are often used in conjunction with imaging-based tests to aid in the diagnosis of PDAC, there is still a need for more sensitive and specific biomarkers for early detection of PDAC.

METHODS: We obtained serum samples from 88 subjects (patients with PDAC (n = 58) and controls (n = 30)). We carried out a multi-omics analysis to measure cytokines and related proteins using proximity extension technology and lipidomics and metabolomics using tandem mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis was carried out to find molecular alterations in patients with PDAC and a machine learning model was used to derive a molecular signature of PDAC.

RESULTS: We quantified 1,462 circulatory proteins along with 873 lipids and 1,001 metabolites. A total of 505 proteins, 186 metabolites and 33 lipids including bone marrow stromal antigen 2 (BST2), keratin 18 (KRT18), and cholesteryl ester(20:5) were found to be significantly altered in patients. We identified different levels of sphingosine, sphinganine, urobilinogen and lactose indicating that glycosphingolipid and galactose metabolisms were significantly altered in patients compared to controls. In addition, elevated levels of diacylglycerols and decreased cholesteryl esters were observed in patients. Using a machine learning model, we identified a signature of 38 biomarkers for PDAC, composed of 21 proteins, 4 lipids, and 13 metabolites.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study identified several proteins, metabolites and lipids involved in various pathways including cholesterol and lipid metabolism to be changing in patients. In addition, we discovered a multi-analyte signature that could be further tested for detection of PDAC.

PMID:39666045 | DOI:10.1007/s00535-024-02197-6

Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(20):e70346. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70346.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For early detection and postoperative monitoring of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), the traditional detection method was limited to its invasiveness and insufficient sensitivity. We aim to use urine tumour DNA (utDNA) for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD), early diagnosis and perioperative monitoring in UTUC.

METHOD: We previously established a utDNA multidimensional bioinformatic valuation model, named utLIFE, using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing and targeted deep sequencing. This prospective cohort enrolled 93 patients diagnosed with UTUC without metastasis. We collected morning urine samples on the day of surgery and the discharge day after the operation for utLIFE testing. In addition, we also enrolled 80 healthy controls to further validate the specificity of the utLIFE model in the study.

RESULTS: The utLIFE of preoperative samples could discriminate UTUC with high specificity (96.25%, 77/80), and high sensitivity (96.77%, 90/93) regardless of stage and grade. The sensitivity of utLIFE was significantly higher than urine cytology (p < 0.001) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) (p < 0.001) (N = 19), especially in early-stage and low-grade UTUC. Postoperative utLIFE scores were significantly decreased compared with those of preoperative samples (79 vs. 36, p < 0.001), indicating its association with tumour burden. For special pathology types, utLIFE performed less well in sensitivity and perioperative alteration.

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we established a bioinformatic utDNA valuation model, utLIFE, which was validated to be a rapid and noninvasive approach with high sensitivity for early detection and MRD monitoring for UTUC.

PMID:39440792 | PMC:PMC11497171 | DOI:10.1002/cam4.70346