Cancer Cell. 2025 Feb 14:S1535-6108(25)00030-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2025.01.012. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Recent advances have shed light on the molecular heterogeneity of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), yet the spatial organizations and cellular interactions in tumor immune microenvironment remain to be elucidated. Here, we employ co-detection by indexing (CODEX) and multi-omics profiling to delineate the spatial landscape for 165 SCLC patients, generating 267 high-dimensional images encompassing over 9.3 million cells. Integrating CODEX and genomic data reveals a multi-positive tumor cell neighborhood within ASCL1⁺ (SCLC-A) subtype, characterized by high SLFN11 expression and associated with poor prognosis. We further develop a cell colony detection algorithm (ColonyMap) and reveal a spatially assembled immune niche consisting of antitumoral macrophages, CD8⁺ T cells and natural killer T cells (MT²) which highly correlates with superior survival and predicts improving immunotherapy response in an independent cohort. This study serves as a valuable resource to study SCLC spatial heterogeneity and offers insights into potential patient stratification and personalized treatments.

PMID:39983726 | DOI:10.1016/j.ccell.2025.01.012

Discov Oncol. 2025 Feb 25;16(1):238. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-01981-x.

ABSTRACT

The fight against lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is challenged by tumor microenvironment (TME)-mediated drug resistance, which limits effective treatment. This study examines the LUAD TME and identifies four distinct subtypes through multi-omics profiling: immune-rich, immune-exhausted, stromal-dominant, and TME-desert. Each subtype has unique molecular features, tumor diversity, and links to clinical outcomes. Immune-rich subtypes respond better to immune checkpoint inhibitors, while stromal-dominant and TME-desert subtypes show resistance to treatment and poor prognosis. Molecular analysis uncovers subtype-specific mutations, chromosomal instability, and altered signaling pathways, pointing to potential therapeutic targets. In silico drug screening identifies promising treatments for resistant subtypes. These findings, validated in independent cohorts, highlight the critical role of the TME in drug resistance and treatment response, providing insights for personalized treatment strategies in LUAD.

PMID:40000527 | PMC:PMC11861463 | DOI:10.1007/s12672-025-01981-x

Cell Metab. 2025 Jan 28:S1550-4131(24)00495-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2024.12.013. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment but remains effective in only a subset of patients. Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiome and its metabolites critically influence ICB efficacy. In this study, we performed a multi-omics analysis of fecal microbiomes and metabolomes from 165 patients undergoing anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy, identifying microbial and metabolic entities associated with treatment response. Integration of data from four public metagenomic datasets (n = 568) uncovered cross-cohort microbial and metabolic signatures, validated in an independent cohort (n = 138). An integrated predictive model incorporating these features demonstrated robust performance. Notably, we characterized five response-associated enterotypes, each linked to specific bacterial taxa and metabolites. Among these, the metabolite phenylacetylglutamine (PAGln) was negatively correlated with response and shown to attenuate anti-PD-1 efficacy in vivo. This study sheds light on the interplay among the gut microbiome, the gut metabolome, and immunotherapy response, identifying potential biomarkers to improve treatment outcomes.

PMID:39909032 | DOI:10.1016/j.cmet.2024.12.013

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 30;15(1):3843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87444-3.

ABSTRACT

Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) is a common malignancy with high heterogeneity and a lack of highly precise treatment options. We downloaded the multiomics data of STAD patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-STAD cohort, which included mRNA, microRNA, long non-coding RNA, somatic mutation, and DNA methylation data, from the sxdyc website. We synthesized the multiomics data of patients with STAD using 10 clustering methods, construct a consensus machine learning-driven signature (CMLS)-related prognostic models by combining 10 machine learning methods, and evaluated the prognosis models using the C-index. The prognostic relationship between CMLS and STAD was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the independent prognostic value of CMLS was determined by univariate and multivariate regression analyses. we also evaluated the immune characteristics, immunotherapy response, and drug sensitivity of different CMLS groups. The results of the multiomics analysis classified STAD into three subtypes, with CS1 resulting in the best survival outcome. In total, 10 hub genes (CES3, AHCYL2, APOD, EFEMP1, CYP1B1, ASPN, CPE, CLIP3, MAP1B, and DKK1) were screened and constructed the CMLS was significantly correlated with prognosis in patients with STAD and was an independent prognostic factor for patients with STAD. Using the CMLS risk score, all patients were divided into a high CMLS group and a low CMLS group. Patients in the low-CMLS group had better survival, more enriched immune cells, and higher tumor mutation load scores, suggesting better immunotherapy responsiveness and a possible "hot tumor" phenotype. Patients in the high-CMLS group had a significantly poorer prognosis and were less sensitive to immunotherapy but were likely to benefit more from chemotherapy and targeted therapy. In this study, 10 clustering methods and 10 machine learning methods were combined to analyze the multiomics of STAD, classify STAD into three subtypes, and constructed CMLS-related prognostic model features, which are important for accurate management and effective treatment of STAD.

PMID:39885324 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-87444-3

BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13526-0.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Not all breast cancer (BC) patients can benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). A poor response may result in patients missing the best opportunity for treatment, ultimately leading to a poor prognosis. Thus, to identify an effective predictor that can assess and predict patient response at early time points, we focused on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), which is a vital noninvasive liquid biopsy biomarker. We performed a meta-analysis to explore the predictive value of response by monitoring ctDNA at four time points of NAT using pathologic complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB).

METHODS: By searching Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science until December 24, 2023, we selected studies concerning the relationship between ctDNA and response or prognosis. We analysed the results at the following various time points: baseline (T0), first cycle of NAT (T1), mid-treatment (MT), and end of NAT (EOT). pCR and RCB were used to evaluate the response as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was to investigate the relationship between ctDNA and prognosis. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were used as effect indicators.

RESULTS: Thirteen reports from twelve studies were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that ctDNA negativity was associated with pCR at T1 (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.57), MT (OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.20-0.60), and EOT (OR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.22-0.66). When RCB was used to evaluate responses, ctDNA negativity was associated with RCB-0/I at the MT (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.55) and EOT (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.15-0.46). Furthermore, ctDNA positivity at T1 predicted a worse prognosis for patients (HR = 2.73; 95% CI: 1.29-5.75). We also performed a subgroup analysis to more accurately assess the predictive value of ctDNA for triple-negative breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that the ctDNA status at the early stage of NAT can predict patient response, which provides evidence for adjusting personalized treatment strategies and improving patient survival.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024496465.

PMID:39844103 | PMC:PMC11752932 | DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13526-0

Am J Hum Genet. 2025 Jan 6:S0002-9297(24)00456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.12.014. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Mosaic loss of Y (mLOY) is the most common somatic chromosomal alteration detected in human blood. The presence of mLOY is associated with altered blood cell counts and increased risk of Alzheimer disease, solid tumors, and other age-related diseases. We sought to gain a better understanding of genetic drivers and associated phenotypes of mLOY through analyses of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of a large set of genetically diverse males from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program. We show that haplotype-based calling methods can be used with WGS data to successfully identify mLOY events. This approach enabled us to identify differences in mLOY frequencies across populations defined by genetic similarity, revealing a higher frequency of mLOY in the European (EUR) ancestry group compared to other ancestries. We identify multiple loci associated with mLOY susceptibility and show that subsets of human hematopoietic stem cells are enriched for the activity of mLOY susceptibility variants. Finally, we found that certain alleles on chromosome Y are more likely to be lost than others in detectable mLOY clones.

PMID:39809269 | DOI:10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.12.014

Cancer Lett. 2025 Jan 12;612:217462. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217462. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

A user-friendly integrated database, RMethyMD (http://www.tmliang.cn/rnamethy), was developed to provide a comprehensive analysis of methylation regulators aimed at facilitating the exploration of molecular features in tumorigenesis and clinical implications in cancer diagnosis and treatment via a multiomics approach. Subsequently, molecular landscapes and a robust constructed m6A-based prognostic model using coxBoost + RSF algorithms in lung cancer highlighted m6A as a suitable marker to guide therapeutic strategy. RMethyMD provides a comprehensive resource and multiomics analysis to explore m6A-based prognostic and clinical values, thereby contributing to aiding personalized cancer therapy.

PMID:39809358 | DOI:10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217462

Global Spine J. 2025 Jan;15(1_suppl):16S-28S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231222012.

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review.

OBJECTIVES: This article aims to provide a narrative review of the current state of research for liquid biopsy in spinal tumors and to discuss the potential application of liquid biopsy in the clinical management of patients with spinal tumors.

METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases, and the review was limited to articles of English language. All the relevant articles which were identified to be related to liquid biomarker study in spinal tumors, were studied in full text.

RESULTS: Liquid biopsy has revolutionized the field of precision medicine by guiding personalized clinical management of cancer patients based on the liquid biomarker status. In recent years, more research has been done to investigate its potential utilization in patients with tumors from the spine. Herein, we review the liquid biomarkers that have been proposed in different spine malignancies including chordoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, astrocytoma and ependymoma. We also discuss the wide window of opportunity to utilize these liquid biomarkers in diagnosis, treatment response, monitoring, and detection of minimal residual disease in patients with spinal tumors.

CONCLUSIONS: Liquid biomarkers, especially blood-derived circulating tumor DNA, has a promising clinical utility as they are disease-specific, minimally invasive, and the procedure is repeatable. Prospective studies with larger populations are needed to fully establish its use in the setting of spinal tumors.

PMID:39801114 | PMC:PMC11726521 | DOI:10.1177/21925682231222012

Clin Transl Med. 2025 Jan;15(1):e70160. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70160.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Plasma protein has gained prominence in the non-invasive predicting of lung cancer. We utilised Zeolite Zotero NaY-based plasma proteomics to investigate its potential for multiple event predicting, including lung cancer diagnosis (task #1), lymph node metastasis detection (task #2) and tumour‒node‒metastasis (TNM) staging (task #3).

METHODS: A total of 4703 plasma proteins were quantified from 241 participants based on a prospective cohort of 2757 participants. An additional 46 participants from external prospective cohort of 735 participants were used for validation. Feature selection was performed using differential expressed protein analysis, area under curve (AUC) evaluation and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Random forest was used for multitask model construction based on the key proteins. Feature importance was interpreted using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) algorithm.

RESULTS: For task #1, 10 proteins panel showed an AUC of .87 (.77‒.97) in the external validation. After integrating clinical factors, a significant increase diagnostic accuracy was observed with AUC of .91 (.85‒.98). For task #2, nine proteins panel achieved an AUC of .88 (.80‒.96), integration model showed an increase diagnostic accuracy with AUC of .90 (.85‒.97). For task #3, 10 proteins panel showed an AUC of .88 (.74‒.96) for stage I, .92 (.84‒.97) for stage II, .88 (.76‒.96) for stage III and .99 (.98‒.99) for stage IV in the integration model.

CONCLUSIONS: This study comprehensively profiled the NaY-based plasma proteome biomarker, laying the foundation for a high-performance blood test for predicting multiple events in lung cancer.

KEY POINTS: Our study developed an innovative nanomaterial, Zeolite NaY, which addressed the masking effect and improved the depth of the proteome. The performance of NaY-based plasma proteomics as a preclinical diagnostic tool was validated through both internal and external cohort. Furthermore, we explored the different patterns of plasma protein changes during the progression of lung cancer and used the explanations method to elucidate the roles of proteins in the multitask predictive model.

PMID:39783847 | PMC:PMC11714244 | DOI:10.1002/ctm2.70160

Semin Cancer Biol. 2024 Dec 27;109:25-43. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2024.12.005. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most lethal and common form of pancreatic cancer, it has no specific symptoms, and most of the patients are diagnosed when the disease is already at an advanced stage. Chemotherapy typically has only a modest effect, making surgery the most effective treatment option. However, only a small percentage of patients are amenable to surgery. One viable strategy to reduce PDAC death burden associated with the disease is to focus on precursor lesions and identify markers able to predict who will evolve into PDAC. While most PDACs are believed to be preceded by pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms (PanINs), 5-10 % arise from Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), which are mass-forming cystic lesions that are very common in the general population. IPMNs offer an invaluable model of pancreatic carcinogenesis for researchers to analyse, as well as a target population for PDAC early detection by clinicians. The evolution of IPMN into cancer is a complex and multistep process, therefore the identification of individual markers will not be the solution. In recent years, multiple omics technologies have been instrumental to identify possible biomarkers of IPMN progression and carcinogenesis. The only foreseeable strategy will be to integrate multi-omics data, alongside clinical and morphological features, into a progression score or signature using either standard epidemiologic tools or artificial intelligence. The aim of this manuscript is to review the current knowledge on genetic biomarkers and to briefly mention also additional omics, such as metabolomics, the exposome, the miRNome and epigenomics of IPMNs.

PMID:39733817 | DOI:10.1016/j.semcancer.2024.12.005