J Liq Biopsy. 2025 Aug 9;9:100323. doi: 10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100323. eCollection 2025 Sep.

ABSTRACT

Liquid biopsy, specifically circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, has emerged as a transformative tool in precision oncology, providing real-time, minimally invasive characterizations of the tumor and tumor dynamics. While tissue biopsy is a critical tool for baseline diagnosis of malignancy, it is often limited by sampling constraints and an inability to capture tumor heterogeneity. In this study, we explored the clinical utility of serial ctDNA testing in guiding therapeutic decisions across a cohort of 30 patients with diverse solid tumors. Our real-world analysis demonstrates that ctDNA profiling meaningfully influenced treatment escalation, de-escalation, disease monitoring, and early relapse prediction. Cases where ctDNA positivity indicated minimal residual disease prompted timely escalation of therapy, while ctDNA clearance allowed safe treatment de-intensification, minimizing toxicity without compromising outcomes. Longitudinal ctDNA monitoring provided a dynamic, non-invasive method for assessing treatment response and detecting recurrence months before radiological progression. Our study highlights the potential of integrating liquid biopsy into routine clinical practice to enable dynamic treatment monitoring, early detection of therapeutic resistance, and more informed, personalized decision-making across various cancer types.

PMID:40919127 | PMC:PMC12409318 | DOI:10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100323

Int J Biol Macromol. 2025 Sep 5;327(Pt 2):147473. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.147473. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Osteosarcoma (OS), the most prevalent primary bone malignancy in adolescents, is characterized by aggressive progression and early metastasis. However, the epigenetic drivers of its metastatic heterogeneity remain poorly understood. Herein, we integrated bulk DNA methylation profiling and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to elucidate the epigenetic mechanisms driving OS metastatic heterogeneity. Consensus clustering identified two methylation subtypes (K = 2) with distinct survival outcomes, where hypermethylated (MSO-high) tumors exhibited poor prognosis. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) revealed methylation-associated modules enriched in metabolic and immune pathways, pinpointing key genes such as CAMK1G and SLC11A1. Single-cell profiling uncovered MSO-high myeloid cells associated with inflammatory and oxidative phosphorylation pathways, while MSO-high OS cells displayed transdifferentiation toward fibroblasts via pseudotime trajectories, remodeling the extracellular matrix (ECM) to facilitate lung metastasis. Conversely, MSO-low tumors activated HLA-B-mediated neutrophil-CD8+ T cell interactions, promoting lymphatic metastasis via CXCR4/CXCL12 signaling. Furthermore, functional validation using the DNA demethylating agent decitabine demonstrated reduced fibroblastic transdifferentiation and suppressed invasive capacity in MSO-high osteosarcoma cells, supporting the therapeutic potential of targeting methylation dysregulation. These findings establish a model where DNA methylation dictates metastatic phenotypes through differential tumor-stromal crosstalk, providing novel targets for epigenetic therapy to disrupt fibrotic-immune networks and metastatic colonization.

PMID:40915448 | DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.147473

bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Aug 25:2025.08.21.671519. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.21.671519.

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Recent advancements in targeted therapies and immunotherapies have achieved remarkable success. However, patient responses to treatments with lung cancer vary substantially. The mutation status of driver genes can direct personalized treatment, but their prognostic value and treatment efficacy are limited. In this study, we developed a statistical framework named Genomic Aberration-Derived Signature for Patient Stratification (GASPS) to characterize the transcriptomic deregulation of driver genomic aberrations and stratify patients. By applying GASPS to The Cancer Genome Atlas Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-LUAD) data, we developed gene signatures for 38 driver genomic aberrations, including gene mutations, amplifications, and deletions. These signatures were applied to independent lung cancer transcriptomic datasets containing a total of 2,226 patient samples. Our results indicated that these driver gene signatures are much more prognostic than their corresponding genomic mutations. Interestingly, the two EGFR-related signatures characterizing EGFR mutation and amplification, respectively, exhibited contrasting associations with prognosis, treatment response, and immune infiltration in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, the STK11 mutation signature, rather than the mutation status, was found to be predictive of the response and long-term benefit of patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade therapy in lung cancer. This framework is readily applicable to most cancer types using existing data to improve prognostic risk assessment and treatment efficacy by guiding personalized therapies.

PMID:40909579 | PMC:PMC12407784 | DOI:10.1101/2025.08.21.671519

bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Aug 25:2025.08.21.671519. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.21.671519.

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Recent advancements in targeted therapies and immunotherapies have achieved remarkable success. However, patient responses to treatments with lung cancer vary substantially. The mutation status of driver genes can direct personalized treatment, but their prognostic value and treatment efficacy are limited. In this study, we developed a statistical framework named Genomic Aberration-Derived Signature for Patient Stratification (GASPS) to characterize the transcriptomic deregulation of driver genomic aberrations and stratify patients. By applying GASPS to The Cancer Genome Atlas Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-LUAD) data, we developed gene signatures for 38 driver genomic aberrations, including gene mutations, amplifications, and deletions. These signatures were applied to independent lung cancer transcriptomic datasets containing a total of 2,226 patient samples. Our results indicated that these driver gene signatures are much more prognostic than their corresponding genomic mutations. Interestingly, the two EGFR-related signatures characterizing EGFR mutation and amplification, respectively, exhibited contrasting associations with prognosis, treatment response, and immune infiltration in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, the STK11 mutation signature, rather than the mutation status, was found to be predictive of the response and long-term benefit of patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade therapy in lung cancer. This framework is readily applicable to most cancer types using existing data to improve prognostic risk assessment and treatment efficacy by guiding personalized therapies.

PMID:40909579 | PMC:PMC12407784 | DOI:10.1101/2025.08.21.671519