arXiv:2603.07717v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We test whether LLMs show robust decision biases. Treating models as participants in two-arm bandits, we ran 20000 trials per condition across four decoding configurations. Under symmetric rewards, models amplified positional order into stubborn one-arm policies. Under asymmetric rewards, they exploited rigidly yet underperformed an oracle and rarely re-checked. The observed patterns were consistent across manipulations of temperature and top-p, with top-k held at the provider default, indicating that the qualitative behaviours are robust to the two decoding knobs typically available to practitioners. Crucially, moving beyond descriptive metrics to computational modelling, a hierarchical Rescorla-Wagner-softmax fit revealed the underlying strategies: low learning rates and very high inverse temperatures, which together explain both noise-to-bias amplification and rigid exploitation. These results position minimal bandits as a tractable probe of LLM decision tendencies and motivate hypotheses about how such biases could shape human-AI interaction.

arXiv:2603.08322v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study mathematical discovery through the lens of neurosymbolic reasoning, where an AI agent powered by a large language model (LLM), coupled with symbolic computation tools, and human strategic direction, jointly produced a new result in combinatorial design theory. The main result of this human-AI collaboration is a tight lower bound on the imbalance of Latin squares for the notoriously difficult case $n \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$. We reconstruct the discovery process from detailed interaction logs spanning multiple sessions over several days and identify the distinct cognitive contributions of each component. The AI agent proved effective at uncovering hidden structure and generating hypotheses. The symbolic component consists of computer algebra, constraint solvers, and simulated annealing, which provides rigorous verification and exhaustive enumeration. Human steering supplied the critical research pivot that transformed a dead end into a productive inquiry. Our analysis reveals that multi-model deliberation among frontier LLMs proved reliable for criticism and error detection but unreliable for constructive claims. The resulting human-AI mathematical contribution, a tight lower bound of $4n(n{-}1)/9$, is achieved via a novel class of near-perfect permutations. The bound was formally verified in Lean 4. Our experiments show that neurosymbolic systems can indeed produce genuine discoveries in pure mathematics.

arXiv:2603.08425v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents IronEngine, a general AI assistant platform organized around a unified orchestration core that connects a desktop user interface, REST and WebSocket APIs, Python clients, local and cloud model backends, persistent memory, task scheduling, reusable skills, 24-category tool execution, MCP-compatible extensibility, and hardware-facing integration. IronEngine introduces a three-phase pipeline -- Discussion (Planner--Reviewer collaboration), Model Switch (VRAM-aware transition), and Execution (tool-augmented action loop) -- that separates planning quality from execution capability. The system features a hierarchical memory architecture with multi-level consolidation, a vectorized skill repository backed by ChromaDB, an adaptive model management layer supporting 92 model profiles with VRAM-aware context budgeting, and an intelligent tool routing system with 130+ alias normalization and automatic error correction. We present experimental results on file operation benchmarks achieving 100\% task completion with a mean total time of 1541 seconds across four heterogeneous tasks, and provide detailed comparisons with representative AI assistant systems including ChatGPT, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, and open-source agent frameworks. Without disclosing proprietary prompts or core algorithms, this paper analyzes the platform's architectural decomposition, subsystem design, experimental performance, safety boundaries, and comparative engineering advantages. The resulting study positions IronEngine as a system-oriented foundation for general-purpose personal assistants, automation frameworks, and future human-centered agent platforms.

arXiv:2603.06585v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present an open, sport-agnostic platform that turns tracking into comparable spatial measures across professional Ultimate, basketball, and soccer. Coaches in all three sports ask the same question: where is the usable space, and when should an off-ball run start? Our workflow standardizes inputs, provides timing-aware spatial evaluations, and makes it possible to reuse the same analysis across sports. We illustrate the approach with Ultimate as a focused testbed and then examine transfer between basketball and soccer. Together, these results show a practical path toward consistent, comparable evaluation across various invasion sports.

arXiv:2603.06926v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mindfulness meditation is a widely accessible and evidence-based method for supporting mental health. Despite the proliferation of mindfulness meditation apps, sustaining user engagement remains a persistent challenge. Personalizing the meditation experience is a promising strategy to improve engagement, but it often requires costly and unscalable manual effort. We present MindfulAgents, a multi-agent system powered by large language models that (1) generates guided meditation scripts based on an expert-established mindfulness framework, (2) encourages users' reflection on emotional states and mindfulness skills, and (3) enables real-time personalization of the mindfulness meditation experience for each user. In a formative lab study (N=13), MindfulAgents significantly improved in-session engagement (p = 0.011) and self-awareness (p = 0.014), and reduced momentary stress (p = 0.020). Furthermore, a four-week deployment study (N=62) demonstrated a notable increase in long-term engagement (p = 0.002) and level of mindfulness (p = 0.023). Participants reported that MindfulAgents offered more relevant meditation sessions personalized to individual needs in various contexts, supporting sustained practice. Our findings highlight the potential of LLM-driven personalization for enhancing user engagement in digital mindfulness meditation interventions.

arXiv:2603.07070v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: User reviews on e-commerce and review sites are crucial for making purchase decisions, although creating detailed reviews is time-consuming and labor-intensive. In this study, we propose a novel use of dialogue systems to facilitate user review creation by generating reviews from information gathered during interview dialogues with users. To validate our approach, we implemented our system using GPT-4 and conducted comparative experiments from the perspectives of system users and review readers. The results indicate that participants who used our system rated their interactions positively. Additionally, reviews generated by our system required less editing to achieve user satisfaction compared to those by the baseline. We also evaluated the reviews from the reader' perspective and found that our system-generated reviews are more helpful than those written by humans. Despite challenges with the fluency of the generated reviews, our method offers a promising new approach to review writing.

arXiv:2603.07184v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Analyzing creative activity traces requires capturing activity at appropriate granularity and interpreting it in ways that reflect the structure of creative practice. However, existing approaches record state changes without preserving the intent or relationships that define higher-level creative moves. This decoupling manifests differently across domains: GenAI tools lose non-linear exploration structure, visualization authoring obscures representational intent, and programmatic environments flatten interaction boundaries. We present three complementary approaches: a node-based interface for stateful GenAI artifact management, a vocabulary of visual cues as higher-level creative moves in visualization authoring, and a programming model that embeds semantic histories directly into interaction state.

arXiv:2603.07339v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deliberative democratic theory suggests that civic competence: the capacity to navigate disagreement, weigh competing values, and arrive at collective decisions is not innate but developed through practice. Yet opportunities to cultivate these skills remain limited, as traditional deliberative processes like citizens' assemblies reach only a small fraction of the population. We present Agora, an early-stage AI-powered platform that uses LLMs to organize authentic human voices on policy issues, helping users build consensus-finding skills by proposing and revising policy recommendations, hearing supporting and opposing perspectives, and receiving feedback on how policy changes affect predicted support. In a preliminary study with 44 university students, participants using the full interface (with access to voice explanations) reported higher levels of problem-solving skills, internal deliberation, and produced higher quality consensus statements compared to a control condition showing only aggregate support distributions. These initial findings point toward a promising direction for scaling civic education.

arXiv:2603.07364v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The standard engineering approach when facing uncertainty is modelling. Mixing data from a well-calibrated model with real recordings has led to breakthroughs in many applications of AI, from computer vision to autonomous driving. This type of model-based data augmentation is now beginning to show promising results in biosignal processing as well. However, while these simulated data are necessary, they are not sufficient for virtual neurophysiological experiments. Simply generating neural signals that reproduce a predetermined motor behaviour does not capture the flexibility, variability, and causal structure required to probe neural mechanisms during control tasks. In this study, we present an in silico neuromechanical model that combines a fully forward musculoskeletal simulation, reinforcement learning, and sequential, online electromyography synthesis. This framework provides not only synchronised kinematics, dynamics, and corresponding neural activity, but also explicitly models feedback and feedforward control in a virtual participant. In this way, online control problems can be represented, as the simulated human adapts its behaviour via a learned RL policy in response to a neural interface. For example, the virtual user can learn hand movements robust to perturbations or the control of a virtual gesture decoder. We illustrate the approach using a gesturing task within a biomechanical hand model, and lay the groundwork for using this technique to evaluate neural controllers, augment training datasets, and generate synthetic data for neurological conditions.

arXiv:2603.07459v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The growing use of AI applications among freelance workers is reshaping trust and relationships with clients. This paper investigates how both workers and clients perceive AI use and disclosure in the freelance economy through a three-stage study: interviews with workers and two survey studies with workers and clients. Findings first reveal a key expectation gap around disclosure: Workers often adopt passive disclosure practices, revealing AI use only when asked, as they assume clients can already detect it. Clients, however, are far less confident in recognizing AI-assisted work and prefer proactive disclosure. A second finding highlights the role of unclear or absent client AI policies, which leave workers consistently misinterpreting clients' expectations for AI use and disclosure. Together, these gaps point to the need for clearer guidelines and practices for AI disclosure. Insights extend beyond freelancing, offering implications for trust, accountability, and policy design in other AI-mediated work domains.

arXiv:2603.07709v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mental healthcare services in the UK lack tools and resources to address the cultural needs of Muslim women, often leaving them feeling as though their values are pathologised and limiting trust and engagement [1]. Despite growing awareness of cultural competency, few interventions integrate Islamic frameworks into therapeutic support. This report investigates the design and evaluation of YAQIN, a co-designed AI-based application supporting culturally and faith-sensitive mental health engagement for Muslim women. With almost 1.9 million Muslim women in England in 2021, YAQIN responds to a gap in care [2]. It leverages AI\'s anonymity and continuous support through a faith-aware chatbot and guided journaling tool grounded in user-centred design and Islamic psychology. The YAQIN design research methodology comprised three stages: contextual investigation and literature review, user research with N=14 stakeholders including Muslim women and mental health experts, and prototype development informed by deductive thematic analysis, personas, journey maps, and design specifications. Evaluation involved a co-designed user study with five participants: four Muslim women and one mental health expert who reviewed therapeutic alignment and cultural sensitivity after using the chatbot prototype. Feedback focused on tone, faith relevance, emotional resonance, and the Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline enabling contextual continuity. Participants highlighted YAQIN\'s ability to bridge cultural gaps in trust and therapeutic confidence. Feedback included suggestions of including linguistic diversity and routine-based guidance. This project demonstrates how culturally sensitive AI can improve mental healthcare accessibility and trust for marginalised communities and highlights the potential of faith-integrated technology in healthcare innovation.

arXiv:2603.07834v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid integration of conversational AI systems into educational settings has intensified ethical concerns about academic integrity, fairness, and students' cognitive development. Institutional responses have largely centered on AI detection tools and restrictive policies, yet such approaches have proven unreliable and ethically contentious. This paper reframes AI misuse in education not primarily as a detection problem, but as a measurement problem rooted in the loss of visibility into the learning process. When AI enters the assessment loop, educators often retain access to final outputs but lose valuable insight into how those outputs were produced. Drawing on research in cognitive offloading, learning analytics, and multimodal timeline reconstruction, we propose the Learning Visibility Framework, grounded in three principles: clear specification and modeling of acceptable AI use, recognition of learning processes as assessable evidence alongside outcomes, and the establishment of transparent timelines of student activity. Rather than promoting surveillance, the framework emphasizes transparency and shared evidence as foundations for ethical AI integration in classroom settings. By shifting focus from adversarial detection toward process visibility, this work offers a principled pathway for aligning AI use with educational values while preserving trust and transparency between students and educators

arXiv:2603.08017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In real-world collaboration, alignment, process structure, and outcome quality do not exhibit a simple linear or one-to-one correspondence: similar alignment may accompany either rapid convergence or extensive multi-branch exploration, and lead to different results. Existing accounts often isolate these dimensions or focus on specific participant types, limiting structural accounts of collaboration. We reconceptualize collaboration through two complementary lenses. The task lens models collaboration as trajectory evolution in a structured task space, revealing patterns such as advancement, branching, and backtracking. The intent lens examines how individual intents are expressed within shared contexts and enter situated decisions. Together, these lenses clarify the structural relationships among alignment, decision-making, and trajectory structure. Rather than reducing collaboration to outcome quality or treating alignment as the sole objective, we propose a unified dynamic view of the relationships among alignment, process, and outcome, and use it to re-examine collaboration structure across Human-Human, AI-AI, and Human-AI settings.

arXiv:2603.08420v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Self-driving laboratories (SDLs) are rapidly transforming research in chemistry and materials science to accelerate new discoveries. Mobile robot chemists (MRCs) play a pivotal role by autonomously navigating the lab to transport samples, effectively connecting synthesis, analysis, and characterisation equipment. The instruments within an SDL are typically designed or retrofitted to be accessed by both human and robotic chemists, ensuring operational flexibility and integration between manual and automated workflows. In many scenarios, human and robotic chemists may need to use the same equipment simultaneously. Currently, MRCs rely on simple LiDAR-based obstruction detection, which forces the robot to passively wait if a human is present. This lack of situational awareness leads to unnecessary delays and inefficient coordination in time-critical automated workflows in human-robot shared labs. To address this, we present an initial study of an embodied, AI-driven perception method that facilitates proactive human-robot interaction in shared-access scenarios. Our method features a hierarchical human intention prediction model that allows the robot to distinguish between preparatory actions (waiting) and transient interactions (accessing the instrument). Our results demonstrate that the proposed approach enhances efficiency by enabling proactive human-robot interaction, streamlining coordination, and potentially increasing the efficiency of autonomous scientific labs.

arXiv:2603.08448v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based AI systems have shown promise for patient-facing diagnostic and management conversations in simulated settings. Translating these systems into clinical practice requires assessment in real-world workflows with rigorous safety oversight. We report a prospective, single-arm feasibility study of an LLM-based conversational AI, the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE), conducting clinical history taking and presentation of potential diagnoses for patients to discuss with their provider at urgent care appointments at a leading academic medical center. 100 adult patients completed an AMIE text-chat interaction up to 5 days before their appointment. We sought to assess the conversational safety and quality, patient and clinician experience, and clinical reasoning capabilities compared to primary care providers (PCPs). Human safety supervisors monitored all patient-AMIE interactions in real time and did not need to intervene to stop any consultations based on pre-defined criteria. Patients reported high satisfaction and their attitudes towards AI improved after interacting with AMIE (p

arXiv:2505.10742v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Systems like ChatGPT and Claude assist billions through proactive dialogue-offering unsolicited, task-relevant information. Drawing on Cognitive Load Theory, we study how cognitive load shapes performance in AI-assisted knowledge work. We recruited 34 financial professionals to complete a complex valuation task using GPT-4o and developed a transcript-based framework estimating intrinsic and extraneous load from computational indicators anchored in a task decomposition and knowledge graph. Across 1,178 participant-subtask observations, AI-generated content usage is positively associated with quality, while extraneous load shows the largest negative association-roughly three times that of intrinsic load. Mediation reveals a compensatory pathway partially offsetting but not eliminating load-related deficits. Extraneous load persists within speakers and spills asymmetrically to model responses. Model-initiated task switching is the strongest predictor of decline. Expertise moderates these dynamics: less experienced professionals face larger penalties and derive greater marginal gains from AI-generated content, yet are not those who most increase uptake under load.

arXiv:2602.01347v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Millions of users turn to consumer AI chatbots to discuss mental health and behavioral concerns. While this presents unprecedented opportunities to deliver population-level support, it also highlights an urgent need for rigorous and scalable safety evaluations. Here we introduce SIM-VAIL, an AI chatbot auditing framework that captures how harmful chatbot responses manifest across a range of mental health contexts. SIM-VAIL pairs a simulated user, harboring a distinct psychiatric vulnerability and conversational intent, with a frontier AI chatbot. It scores conversation turns on 13 clinically relevant risk dimensions, enabling context-dependent, temporally resolved safety assessment. Across 810 conversations, encompassing over 90,000 turn-level ratings and 30 psychiatric user profiles, we found evidence of concerning chatbot behavior across virtually all user phenotypes and most of the 9 consumer AI chatbots audited, albeit reduced in newer models. Rather than arising abruptly, concerning behavior accumulated over multiple turns. Risk profiles were phenotype-dependent and exhibited trade-offs, indicating that chatbot behaviors that appear supportive in general settings can become maladaptive when they align with mechanisms that sustain a user's vulnerability. These findings identify a systematic failure mode in human-AI interactions, which we term Vulnerability-Amplifying Interaction Loops (VAILs), and underscore the need for multidimensional approaches to risk quantification. SIM-VAIL provides a scalable framework for quantifying how mental health risk is distributed across user phenotypes, conversational trajectories, and clinically grounded behavioral dimensions, offering a new foundation for targeted safety improvements.

arXiv:2602.12748v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The explainable AI (XAI) research community has proposed numerous technical methods, yet deploying explainability as systems remains challenging: Interactive explanation systems require both suitable algorithms and system capabilities that maintain explanation usability across repeated queries, evolving models and data, and governance constraints. We argue that operationalizing XAI requires treating explainability as an information systems problem where user interaction demands induce specific system requirements. We introduce X-SYS, a reference architecture for interactive explanation systems, that guides (X)AI researchers, developers and practitioners in connecting interactive explanation user interfaces (XUI) with system capabilities. X-SYS organizes around four quality attributes named STAR (scalability, traceability, responsiveness, and adaptability), and specifies a five-component decomposition (XUI Services, Explanation Services, Model Services, Data Services, Orchestration and Governance). It maps interaction patterns to system capabilities to decouple user interface evolution from backend computation. We implement X-SYS through SemanticLens, a system for semantic search and activation steering in vision-language models. SemanticLens demonstrates how contract-based service boundaries enable independent evolution, offline/online separation ensures responsiveness, and persistent state management supports traceability. Together, this work provides a reusable blueprint and concrete instantiation for interactive explanation systems supporting end-to-end design under operational constraints.

arXiv:2602.22401v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: AI agents -- systems that execute multi-step reasoning workflows with persistent state, tool access, and specialist skills -- represent a qualitative shift from prior automation technologies in social science. Unlike chatbots that respond to isolated queries, AI agents can now read files, run code, query databases, search the web, and invoke domain-specific skills to execute entire research pipelines autonomously. This paper introduces the concept of vibe researching -- the AI-era parallel to vibe coding -- and uses scholar-skill, a 26-skill plugin for Claude Code covering the full research pipeline from idea to submission across 18 orchestrated phases with 53 quality gates, as an illustrative case. I develop a cognitive task framework that classifies research activities along two dimensions -- codifiability and tacit knowledge requirement -- to identify a delegation boundary that is cognitive, not sequential: it cuts through every stage of the research pipeline, not between stages. I argue that AI agents excel at speed, coverage, and methodological scaffolding but struggle with theoretical originality and tacit field knowledge. The paper concludes with an analysis of three implications for the profession -- augmentation with fragile conditions, stratification risk, and a pedagogical crisis -- and proposes five principles for responsible vibe researching.

arXiv:2603.05069v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Personal AI agents face a fundamental deployment paradox on mobile: persistent background execution drains battery and violates platform sandboxing policies, yet purely reactive agents miss time-sensitive obligations until the user remembers to ask. We present Jagarin, a three-layer architecture that resolves this paradox through structured hibernation and demand-driven wake. The first layer, DAWN (Duty-Aware Wake Network), is an on-device heuristic engine that computes a composite urgency score from four signals: duty-typed optimal action windows, user behavioral engagement prediction, opportunity cost of inaction, and cross-duty batch resonance. It uses adaptive per-user thresholds to decide when a sleeping agent should nudge or escalate. The second layer, ARIA (Agent Relay Identity Architecture), is a commercial email identity proxy that routes the full commercial inbox -- obligations, promotional offers, loyalty rewards, and platform updates -- to appropriate DAWN handlers by message category, eliminating cold-start and removing manual data entry. The third layer, ACE (Agent-Centric Exchange), is a protocol framework for direct machine-readable communication from institutions to personal agents, replacing human-targeted email as the canonical channel. Together, these three layers form a complete stack from institutional signal to on-device action, without persistent cloud state, continuous background execution, or privacy compromise. A working Flutter prototype is demonstrated on Android, combining all three layers with an ephemeral cloud agent invoked only on user-initiated escalation.