arXiv:2605.24180v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Collaboration is the defining mode of modern science, yet its core mechanism -- feedback -- remains hard to observe, difficult to scale, and unequally distributed. Here we test whether large language models (LLMs) can contribute to this hidden but vital practice and reallocate scientific feedback, an essential yet scarce resource for knowledge production. In a global large-scale randomized field experiment, we delivered customized LLM-generated feedback for over 31,000 arXiv preprints across 150 fields and more than 45,000 researchers from 133 geographic regions. Relative to controls, authors who received feedback had a significantly higher likelihood of revising their manuscripts, corresponding to a 12.55% relative increase over the baseline revision rate. Exposure to AI feedback also increased authors' subsequent use of LLM tools in their future papers, suggesting longer-run shifts in scientific practice. These effects were strongest among authors from non-English-dominant research regions, manuscripts less embedded in the scholarly literature, and teams with lower h-indexes and earlier career stages, consistent with the idea that AI feedback may provide the greatest benefit where access to timely critique is otherwise limited. Together, these findings provide causal evidence that structured AI-based interventions can transform access to scientific feedback from a largely private advantage into a more widely distributed resource, with broader implications for productivity, equity, and capacity across the global research system.

arXiv:2605.25505v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is the first automation wave to reach high-cognitive tasks at scale, yet its effects on intra-urban inequality remain largely unknown. Using 5 million job postings from Beijing (2018--2024), we construct a neighborhood-level GenAI Exposure Index by aggregating task-level assessments from five leading large language models. We examine the spatial, structural and causal mechanisms of this shock. We find that GenAI exposure is highly concentrated in the city's core districts, deepening the intra-urban AI divide. Since 2023, high-exposure neighborhoods have experienced wage stagnation even as they continue to attract high-skilled workers -- a "high-skill trap." This wage penalty is driven by task de-skilling and intensified labor-market crowding. A difference-in-differences design centered on ChatGPT's release supports a causal interpretation. These findings challenge the prevailing theory of skill-biased technological change and provide a basis for inclusive AI governance in global technology hubs.

arXiv:2603.29833v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In many systems, communication proceeds by broadcasting rather than single source-target routing, but network structures that maximize signal lifetime are not well understood. Degree correlations are known to influence robustness and spreading, yet their effect on signal persistence has remained unclear. Here we introduce Copy-Spread-Annihilate dynamics, a minimal synchronous broadcasting model with annihilation. We show that signal lifetimes vary non-monotonically with assortativity and are maximized near neutral assortativity, where hub-driven amplification is strong but annihilation via short cycles is still limited. Applying this framework to the mouse connectome suggests assortativity as a structural control parameter for broadcast signal persistence in brain-like and other complex networks.

arXiv:2410.08875v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Designing a network (e.g., a telecommunication or transport network) is mainly done offline, in a planning phase, prior to the operation of the network. On the other hand, a massive effort has been devoted to characterizing dynamic networks, i.e., those that evolve over time. The novelty of this paper is that we introduce a method for the online design of dynamic networks. The need to do so emerges when a network needs to operate in a dynamic and stochastic environment. In this case, one may wish to build a network over time, on the fly, in order to react to the changes of the environment and to keep certain performance targets. We tackle this online design problem with a rolling horizon optimization based on Monte Carlo Tree Search. The potential of online network design is showcased for the design of a futuristic dynamic public transport network, where bus lines are constructed on the fly to better adapt to a stochastic user demand. In such a scenario, we compare our results with state-of-the-art dynamic vehicle routing problem (VRP) resolution methods, simulating requests from a New York City taxi dataset. Differently from classic VRP methods, that extend vehicle trajectories in isolation, our method enables us to build a structured network of line buses, where complex user journeys are possible, thus increasing system performance.

arXiv:2603.06630v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Debates about artificial intelligence capabilities and risks are often conducted without quantitative grounding. This paper applies the methodology of MacKay (2009) -- who reframed energy policy as arithmetic -- to the economy of AI computation. We define the token, the elementary unit of large language model input and output, as a physical quantity with measurable thermodynamic cost. Using Landauer's principle, Shannon's channel capacity, and current infrastructure data, we construct a supply-and-demand balance sheet for global token production. We then derive a finite question budget: the number of meaningful queries humanity can direct at AI systems under physical, information-theoretic, and economic constraints. We apply Coase's theory of the firm and the durable-goods monopoly problem to the AI value chain -- from photon to atom to chip to power to token to question -- to identify where economic value concentrates and where regulatory intervention is warranted. We argue that the expansion of the token budget does not resolve a deeper constraint: under structural uncertainty, the decisive variable is not how many questions can be answered but which questions are worth asking -- a problem of agency and direction that computation alone cannot solve. We connect limits of measurement in the token economy to a structural parallel between Goodhart's law and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, and to Arrow's impossibility result for efficient information pricing. The framework yields order-of-magnitude estimates that discipline policy discussion: at current efficiency, the projected 2028 US AI energy allocation of 326~TWh could support roughly $6.5 \times 10^{17}$ tokens per year, or 225,000 tokens per person per day -- more than three orders of magnitude above estimated mid-2024 utilization.

arXiv:2602.14370v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: More than half the global population now carries devices that can run ChatGPT-like language models with no Internet connection and minimal safety oversight -- and hence the potential to promote self-harm, financial losses and extremism among other dangers. Existing safety tools either require cloud connectivity or discover failures only after harm has occurred. Here we show that a large class of potentially dangerous tipping originates at the atomistic scale in such edge AI due to competition for the machinery's attention. This yields a mathematical formula for the dynamical tipping point n*, governed by dot-product competition for attention between the conversation's context and competing output basins, that reveals new control levers. Validated against multiple AI models, the mechanism can be instantiated for different definitions of 'good' and 'bad' and hence in principle applies across domains (e.g. health, law, finance, defense), changing legal landscapes (e.g. EU, UK, US and state level), languages, and cultural settings.

arXiv:2601.05525v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Artificial intelligence now outperforms humans in several scientific and engineering tasks, yet its internal representations often remain opaque. In this Perspective, we argue that explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), combined with causal reasoning, enables {\it learning from the learners}. Focusing on discovery, optimization and certification, we show how the combination of foundation models and explainability methods allows the extraction of causal mechanisms, guides robust design and control, and supports trust and accountability in high-stakes applications. We discuss challenges in faithfulness, generalization and usability of explanations, and propose XAI as a unifying framework for human-AI collaboration in science and engineering.