arXiv:2306.13732v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study a class of reinforcement learning (RL) tasks where the objective of the agent is to accomplish temporally extended goals. In this setting, a common approach is to represent the tasks as deterministic finite automata (DFA) and integrate them into the state-space for RL algorithms. However, while these machines model the reward function, they often overlook the causal knowledge about the environment. To address this limitation, we propose the Temporal-Logic-based Causal Diagram (TL-CD) in RL, which captures the temporal causal relationships between different properties of the environment. We exploit the TL-CD to devise an RL algorithm in which an agent requires significantly less exploration of the environment. To this end, based on a TL-CD and a task DFA, we identify configurations where the agent can determine the expected rewards early during an exploration. Through a series of case studies, we demonstrate the benefits of using TL-CDs, particularly the faster convergence of the algorithm to an optimal policy due to reduced exploration of the environment.

arXiv:2609.06102v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Cellular automata is a local computation paradigm where complex behavior can arise from local interactions between simple functions. This paradigm has been used to explain many systems such as biological processes, traffic simulation, computer networks, etc. In games, cellular automata have been used in games such as SimCity and for the generation of spatial content such as caves or dungeons. However, creating effective local rules is hard and unintuitive. Cellular automata can be effectively evolved, but may still be hard to interpret. In this work, we introduce the concept of programmable cellular automata, where we represent the system as Python code. We also modularize the cellular automata into local functions and a decision function. Local functions take a local neighborhood and return a value, while the decision function takes the output of the local functions and decides the value of the next state. Separating the cellular automata into modules written in Python helps with understanding how these systems are working. We also explore adding global functions where they take the whole state and compute a function from it. We tested generating levels for three different games from the PCG Benchmark. The results showed that global functions decrease the number of iterations that cellular automata need to solve a problem, and that we cannot find solutions for some problems with purely local functions. Looking into the generated functions, we can see common functions that have been used in different experiments, which not only helps us understand the generator but also helps us understand these games better and what is important for them.

arXiv:2604.01228v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a formal and constructive framework for simulating Alternating Finite Automata (AFAs) using Logic-Gated Time-Shared Feedforward Networks (LG-TS-FFNs). Unlike prior neural automata models limited to Nondeterministic Finite Automata (NFAs) and existential reachability, our architecture integrates learnable, state-dependent biases that function as differentiable logic gates, enabling the representation of both Existential \textsc{\textsc{OR}} and Universal \textsc{\textsc{AND}} aggregation within a shared-parameter linear recurrence. We prove that this architectural modification upgrades the network's computational class to be structurally isomorphic to AFAs, thereby inheriting their exponential succinctness: the network can represent regular languages requiring $2^n$ states in an NFA with only $n$ neurons. We rigorously establish that the forward pass of an LG-TS-FFN exactly simulates the reachability dynamics of an AFA, including instantaneous $\varepsilon$-closures. Furthermore, we demonstrate empirical learnability: a continuous relaxation of the logic gates allows the network to simultaneously recover the automaton's topology and logical semantics from binary labels via standard gradient descent. Extensive experiments confirm that our model achieves perfect recovery of ground-truth automata, bridging the gap between statistical learning and succinct, universal logical reasoning.

arXiv:2603.29140v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Finite state machines (FSM) are executable formal specifications of reactive systems. These machines are designed based on systems' requirements. The requirements are often recorded in textual documents written in natural languages. FSMs play a crucial role in different phases of the model-driven system engineering (MDE). For example, they serve to automate testing activities. FSM quality is critical: the lower the quality of FSM, the higher the number of faults surviving the testing phase and the higher the risk of failure of the systems in production, which could lead to catastrophic scenarios. Therefore, this paper leverages recent advances in the domain of LLM to propose an LLM-based framework for designing FSMs from requirements. The framework also suggests an expert-centric approach based on FSM mutation and test generation for repairing the FSMs produced by LLMs. This paper also provides an experimental analysis and evaluation of LLM's capacities in performing the tasks presented in the framework and FSM repair via various methods. The paper presents experimental results with simulated data. These results and methods bring a new analysis and vision of LLMs that are useful for further development of machine learning technology and its applications to MDE.

arXiv:2603.06710v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mining specifications from execution traces presents an automated way of capturing characteristic system behaviors. However, existing approaches are largely restricted to Boolean abstractions of events, limiting their ability to express data-aware properties. In this paper, we extend mining procedures to operate over richer datatypes. We first establish candidate functions in our domain that cover the set of traces by leveraging Syntax Guided Synthesis (SyGuS) techniques. To capture these function applications temporally, we formalize the semantics of TSL$_f$, a finite-prefix interpretation of Temporal Stream Logic (TSL) that extends LTL$_f$ with support for first-order predicates and functional updates. This allows us to unify a corresponding procedure for learning the data transformations and temporal specifications of a system. We demonstrate our approach synthesizing reactive programs from mined specifications on the OpenAI-Gymnasium ToyText environments, finding that our method is more robust and orders of magnitude more sample-efficient than passive learning baselines on generalized problem instances.

arXiv:2511.02872v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in formal theorem proving, particularly on contest-based mathematical benchmarks like the IMO. However, these contests do not reflect the depth, breadth, and abstraction of modern mathematical research. To bridge this gap, we introduce FATE (Formal Algebra Theorem Evaluation), a new benchmark series in formal algebra designed to chart a course toward advanced mathematical reasoning. We present two new components, FATE-H and FATE-X, each with 100 problems in abstract and commutative algebra. The FATE series spans a difficulty spectrum from undergraduate exercises to problems exceeding PhD qualifying exams. Notably, FATE-X is the first formal benchmark to surpass both PhD-level exam difficulty and the coverage of the Mathlib library. Our evaluations of state-of-the-art LLM provers on this new benchmark reveal a stark performance gap compared to contest math: the best model achieves only 3% (pass@64) accuracy on FATE-H and 0% on FATE-X. Our two-stage evaluation reveals that models' natural-language reasoning is notably more accurate than their ability to formalize this reasoning. We systematically classify the common errors that arise during this formalization process. Furthermore, a comparative study shows that a specialized prover can exhibit less effective reflection than general-purpose models, reducing its accuracy at the natural-language stage. We believe FATE provides a robust and challenging benchmark that establishes essential checkpoints on the path toward research-level formal mathematical reasoning.

arXiv:2510.26840v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Community-driven Text-to-SQL evaluation platforms play a pivotal role in tracking the state of the art of Text-to-SQL performance. The reliability of the evaluation process is critical for driving progress in the field. Current evaluation methods are largely test-based, which involves comparing the execution results of a generated SQL query and a human-labeled ground-truth on a static test database. Such an evaluation is optimistic, as two queries can coincidentally produce the same output on the test database while actually being different. In this work, we propose a new alternative evaluation pipeline, called SpotIt, where a formal bounded equivalence verification engine actively searches for a database that differentiates the generated and ground-truth SQL queries. We develop techniques to extend existing verifiers to support a richer SQL subset relevant to Text-to-SQL. A performance evaluation of ten Text-to-SQL methods on the high-profile BIRD dataset suggests that test-based methods can often overlook differences between the generated query and the ground-truth. Further analysis of the verification results reveals a more complex picture of the current Text-to-SQL evaluation.

arXiv:2602.13351v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Finite automata (FA) are a fundamental computational abstraction that is widely used in practice for various tasks in computer science, linguistics, biology, electrical engineering, and artificial intelligence. Given an input word, an FA maps the word to a result, in the simple case "accept" or "reject", but in general to one of a finite set of results. A question that then arises is: why? Another question is: how can we modify the input word so that it is no longer accepted? One may think that the automaton itself is an adequate explanation of its behaviour, but automata can be very complex and difficult to make sense of directly. In this work, we investigate how to explain the behaviour of an FA on an input word in terms of the word's characters. In particular, we are interested in minimal explanations: what is the minimal set of input characters that explains the result, and what are the minimal changes needed to alter the result? In this paper, we propose an efficient method to determine all minimal explanations for the behaviour of an FA on a particular word. This allows us to give unbiased explanations about which input features are responsible for the result. Experiments show that our approach scales well, even when the underlying problem is challenging.