arXiv:2603.03672v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Shapley value provides a principled foundation for data valuation, but exact computation is #P-hard due to the exponential coalition space. Existing accelerations remain global and ignore a structural property of modern predictors: for a given test instance, only a small subset of training points influences the prediction. We formalize this model-induced locality through support sets defined by the model's computational pathway (e.g., neighbors in KNN, leaves in trees, receptive fields in GNNs), showing that Shapley computation can be projected onto these supports without loss when locality is exact. This reframes Shapley evaluation as a structured data processing problem over overlapping support-induced subset families rather than exhaustive coalition enumeration. We prove that the intrinsic complexity of Local Shapley is governed by the number of distinct influential subsets, establishing an information-theoretic lower bound on retraining operations. Guided by this result, we propose LSMR (Local Shapley via Model Reuse), an optimal subset-centric algorithm that trains each influential subset exactly once via support mapping and pivot scheduling. For larger supports, we develop LSMR-A, a reuse-aware Monte Carlo estimator that remains unbiased with exponential concentration, with runtime determined by the number of distinct sampled subsets rather than total draws. Experiments across multiple model families demonstrate substantial retraining reductions and speedups while preserving high valuation fidelity.

arXiv:2603.03772v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-driven analytics are increasingly crucial to data-centric decision-making. The practice of exporting data to machine learning runtimes incurs high overhead, limits robustness to data drift, and expands the attack surface, especially in multi-tenant, heterogeneous data systems. Integrating AI directly into database engines, while offering clear benefits, introduces challenges in managing joint query processing and model execution, optimizing end-to-end performance, coordinating execution under resource contention, and enforcing strong security and access-control guarantees. This paper discusses the challenges of joint DB-AI, or AIxDB, data management and query processing within AI-powered data systems. It presents various challenges that need to be addressed carefully, such as query optimization, execution scheduling, and distributed execution over heterogeneous hardware. Database components such as transaction management and access control need to be re-examined to support AI lifecycle management, mitigate data drift, and protect sensitive data from unauthorized AI operations. We present a design and preliminary results to demonstrate what may be key to the performance for serving AIxDB queries.

arXiv:2603.03805v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Relational Databases (RDBs) are the backbone of modern business, yet they lack foundation models comparable to those in text or vision. A key obstacle is that high-quality RDBs are private, scarce and structurally heterogeneous, making internet-scale pre-training infeasible. To overcome this data scarcity, We introduce $\textbf{RDB-PFN}$, the first relational foundation model trained purely via $\textbf{synthetic data}$. Inspired by Prior-Data Fitted Networks (PFNs) where synthetic data generated from Structural Causal Models (SCMs) enables reasoning on single tables, we design a $\textbf{Relational Prior Generator}$ to create an infinite stream of diverse RDBs from scratch. Pre-training on $\textbf{over 2 million}$ synthetic single-table and relational tasks, RDB-PFN learns to adapt to any new database instantly via genuine $\textbf{in-context learning}$. Experiments verify RDB-PFN achieves strong few-shot performance on 19 real-world relational prediction tasks, outperforming graph-based and single-table foundation-model baselines (given the same DFS-linearized inputs), while using a lightweight architecture and fast inference. The code is available at https://github.com/MuLabPKU/RDBPFN

arXiv:2603.04334v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present SpotIt+, an open-source tool for evaluating Text-to-SQL systems via bounded equivalence verification. Given a generated SQL query and the ground truth, SpotIt+ actively searches for database instances that differentiate the two queries. To ensure that the generated counterexamples reflect practically relevant discrepancies, we introduce a constraint-mining pipeline that combines rule-based specification mining over example databases with LLM-based validation. Experimental results on the BIRD dataset show that the mined constraints enable SpotIt+ to generate more realistic differentiating databases, while preserving its ability to efficiently uncover numerous discrepancies between generated and gold SQL queries that are missed by standard test-based evaluation.

arXiv:2510.26840v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Community-driven Text-to-SQL evaluation platforms play a pivotal role in tracking the state of the art of Text-to-SQL performance. The reliability of the evaluation process is critical for driving progress in the field. Current evaluation methods are largely test-based, which involves comparing the execution results of a generated SQL query and a human-labeled ground-truth on a static test database. Such an evaluation is optimistic, as two queries can coincidentally produce the same output on the test database while actually being different. In this work, we propose a new alternative evaluation pipeline, called SpotIt, where a formal bounded equivalence verification engine actively searches for a database that differentiates the generated and ground-truth SQL queries. We develop techniques to extend existing verifiers to support a richer SQL subset relevant to Text-to-SQL. A performance evaluation of ten Text-to-SQL methods on the high-profile BIRD dataset suggests that test-based methods can often overlook differences between the generated query and the ground-truth. Further analysis of the verification results reveals a more complex picture of the current Text-to-SQL evaluation.

arXiv:2603.02212v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tabular reasoning benchmarks mix semantic inference, numerical computation, and brittle table formatting, yet evaluations for small models remain vulnerable to contamination, dataset artifacts, and retrieval failures. We propose GLEAN, a lightweight evaluation protocol that integrates contamination-aware probes, weak-supervision governance, retrieval-reasoning diagnostics, and structured error attribution under tight hardware constraints. We evaluate across TabFact, WTQ via Squall, TableBench, RobuT, and SciTab under a 16GB GPU budget. Using Squall gold SQL as an executable anchor (95.2% execution), GLEAN assigns a deterministic error taxonomy (L0-L4 plus L0.5 context miss) and reveals a stable error-mode separation: TAPEX errors skew toward grounding (L3) while TAPAS errors skew toward hallucination/abstention (L2/L0). We validate evidence-row heuristics against SQL-derived rows on simple queries (0.62 precision / 0.71 recall; hybrid recall 0.81) and show that retrieval Recall@K can saturate even when end-to-end EM/F1 remains limited, motivating attribution beyond raw recall. We release a modular framework with audits and sensitivity checks to make small-model tabular evaluation more contamination-aware and diagnostic.

arXiv:2511.04584v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Natural language interfaces to tabular data must handle ambiguities inherent to queries. Instead of treating ambiguity as a deficiency, we reframe it as a feature of cooperative interaction where users are intentional about the degree to which they specify queries. We develop a principled framework based on a shared responsibility of query specification between user and system, distinguishing unambiguous and ambiguous cooperative queries, which systems can resolve through reasonable inference, from uncooperative queries that cannot be resolved. Applying the framework to evaluations for tabular question answering and analysis, we analyze queries in 15 datasets, and observe an uncontrolled mixing of query types neither adequate for evaluating a system's accuracy nor for evaluating interpretation capabilities. This conceptualization around cooperation in resolving queries informs how to design and evaluate natural language interfaces for tabular data analysis, for which we distill concrete directions for future research and broader implications.

arXiv:2509.12610v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicates are foundational components in data analysis systems. However, modern workloads increasingly involve unstructured documents, which demands semantic understanding, beyond traditional value-based predicates. Given enormous documents and ad-hoc queries, while Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate powerful zero-shot capabilities, their high inference cost leads to unacceptable overhead. Therefore, we introduce \textsc{ScaleDoc}, a novel system that addresses this by decoupling predicate execution into an offline representation phase and an optimized online filtering phase. In the offline phase, \textsc{ScaleDoc} leverages a LLM to generate semantic representations for each document. Online, for each query, it trains a lightweight proxy model on these representations to filter the majority of documents, forwarding only the ambiguous cases to the LLM for final decision. Furthermore, \textsc{ScaleDoc} proposes two core innovations to achieve significant efficiency: (1) a contrastive-learning-based framework that trains the proxy model to generate reliable predicating decision scores; (2) an adaptive cascade mechanism that determines the effective filtering policy while meeting specific accuracy targets. Our evaluations across three datasets demonstrate that \textsc{ScaleDoc} achieves over a 2$\times$ end-to-end speedup and reduces expensive LLM invocations by up to 85\%, making large-scale semantic analysis practical and efficient.